Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:2405.17342

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:2405.17342 (math)
[Submitted on 27 May 2024]

Title:Measuring Exploration: Review and Systematic Evaluation of Modelling to Generate Alternatives Methods in Macro-Energy Systems Planning Models

Authors:Michael Lau, Neha Patankar, Jesse D. Jenkins
View a PDF of the paper titled Measuring Exploration: Review and Systematic Evaluation of Modelling to Generate Alternatives Methods in Macro-Energy Systems Planning Models, by Michael Lau and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:As decarbonization agendas mature, macro-energy systems modelling studies have increasingly focused on enhanced decision support methods that move beyond least-cost modelling to improve consideration of additional objectives and tradeoffs. One candidate is Modeling to Generate Alternatives (MGA), which systematically explores new objectives without explicit stakeholder elicitation. Previous literature lacks both a comprehensive review of MGA vector selection methods in large-scale energy system models and comparative testing of their relative efficacies in this setting. To fill this gap, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the MGA literature, identifying at least seven MGA vector selection methodologies and carrying out a systematic evaluation of four: Hop-Skip-Jump, Random Vector, Variable Min/Max, and Modelling All Alternatives. We examine each method's runtime, parallelizability, new solution discovery efficiency, and spatial exploration in lower dimensional (N <= 100) spaces, as well as spatial exploration in a three-zone, 8760-hour capacity expansion model case. Through these tests, we find Random Vector provides the broadest exploration of the near-optimal feasible region and Variable Min/Max provides the most extreme results, while the two tie on computational speed. We thus propose a new Hybrid vector selection approach combining the two methods to take advantage of the strengths of each. Additional analysis is provided on MGA variable selection, in which we demonstrate MGA problems formulated over generation variables fail to retain cost-optimal dispatch and are thus not reflective of real operations of equivalent hypothetical capacity choices. As such, we recommend future studies utilize a parallelized combined vector approach over the set of capacity variables for best results in computational speed and spatial exploration while retaining optimal dispatch.
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2405.17342 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:2405.17342v1 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.17342
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Environmental Research: Energy, Volume 1, Number 4, 2024
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2753-3751/ad7d10
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Michael Lau [view email]
[v1] Mon, 27 May 2024 16:48:42 UTC (2,439 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Measuring Exploration: Review and Systematic Evaluation of Modelling to Generate Alternatives Methods in Macro-Energy Systems Planning Models, by Michael Lau and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SY
eess
eess.SY
math

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack