Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2405.08691

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Robotics

arXiv:2405.08691 (cs)
[Submitted on 14 May 2024 (v1), last revised 15 Aug 2024 (this version, v3)]

Title:Enhancing Reinforcement Learning in Sensor Fusion: A Comparative Analysis of Cubature and Sampling-based Integration Methods for Rover Search Planning

Authors:Jan-Hendrik Ewers, Sarah Swinton, David Anderson, Euan McGookin, Douglas Thomson
View a PDF of the paper titled Enhancing Reinforcement Learning in Sensor Fusion: A Comparative Analysis of Cubature and Sampling-based Integration Methods for Rover Search Planning, by Jan-Hendrik Ewers and Sarah Swinton and David Anderson and Euan McGookin and Douglas Thomson
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:This study investigates the computational speed and accuracy of two numerical integration methods, cubature and sampling-based, for integrating an integrand over a 2D polygon. Using a group of rovers searching the Martian surface with a limited sensor footprint as a test bed, the relative error and computational time are compared as the area was subdivided to improve accuracy in the sampling-based approach. The results show that the sampling-based approach exhibits a $14.75\%$ deviation in relative error compared to cubature when it matches the computational performance at $100\%$. Furthermore, achieving a relative error below $1\%$ necessitates a $10000\%$ increase in relative time to calculate due to the $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ complexity of the sampling-based method. It is concluded that for enhancing reinforcement learning capabilities and other high iteration algorithms, the cubature method is preferred over the sampling-based method.
Comments: Submitted to IROS 2024
Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2405.08691 [cs.RO]
  (or arXiv:2405.08691v3 [cs.RO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.08691
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS58592.2024.10801978
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jan-Hendrik Ewers MEng [view email]
[v1] Tue, 14 May 2024 15:24:52 UTC (1,003 KB)
[v2] Wed, 15 May 2024 06:29:37 UTC (1,003 KB)
[v3] Thu, 15 Aug 2024 19:06:29 UTC (13,452 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Enhancing Reinforcement Learning in Sensor Fusion: A Comparative Analysis of Cubature and Sampling-based Integration Methods for Rover Search Planning, by Jan-Hendrik Ewers and Sarah Swinton and David Anderson and Euan McGookin and Douglas Thomson
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.RO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SY
eess
eess.SY

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack