Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2405.07960

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2405.07960 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 May 2024 (v1), last revised 25 May 2025 (this version, v5)]

Title:AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments

Authors:Samuel Schmidgall, Rojin Ziaei, Carl Harris, Eduardo Reis, Jeffrey Jopling, Michael Moor
View a PDF of the paper titled AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments, by Samuel Schmidgall and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Evaluating large language models (LLM) in clinical scenarios is crucial to assessing their potential clinical utility. Existing benchmarks rely heavily on static question-answering, which does not accurately depict the complex, sequential nature of clinical decision-making. Here, we introduce AgentClinic, a multimodal agent benchmark for evaluating LLMs in simulated clinical environments that include patient interactions, multimodal data collection under incomplete information, and the usage of various tools, resulting in an in-depth evaluation across nine medical specialties and seven languages. We find that solving MedQA problems in the sequential decision-making format of AgentClinic is considerably more challenging, resulting in diagnostic accuracies that can drop to below a tenth of the original accuracy. Overall, we observe that agents sourced from Claude-3.5 outperform other LLM backbones in most settings. Nevertheless, we see stark differences in the LLMs' ability to make use of tools, such as experiential learning, adaptive retrieval, and reflection cycles. Strikingly, Llama-3 shows up to 92% relative improvements with the notebook tool that allows for writing and editing notes that persist across cases. To further scrutinize our clinical simulations, we leverage real-world electronic health records, perform a clinical reader study, perturb agents with biases, and explore novel patient-centric metrics that this interactive environment firstly enables.
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2405.07960 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2405.07960v5 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.07960
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Samuel Schmidgall [view email]
[v1] Mon, 13 May 2024 17:38:53 UTC (9,883 KB)
[v2] Wed, 22 May 2024 01:57:23 UTC (9,914 KB)
[v3] Thu, 30 May 2024 22:56:17 UTC (9,638 KB)
[v4] Sun, 20 Oct 2024 18:58:58 UTC (20,571 KB)
[v5] Sun, 25 May 2025 02:19:37 UTC (18,190 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments, by Samuel Schmidgall and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack