Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2405.03240

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:2405.03240 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 6 May 2024 (v1), last revised 29 Oct 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Accretion Efficiency Evolution of Central Supermassive Black Holes in Quasars

Authors:Arta Khosravi, Alireza Karamzadeh, Seyed Sajad Tabasi, Javad T. Firouzjaee
View a PDF of the paper titled Accretion Efficiency Evolution of Central Supermassive Black Holes in Quasars, by Arta Khosravi and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The ongoing debate regarding the most accurate accretion model for supermassive black holes at the center of quasars has remained a contentious issue in astrophysics. One significant challenge is the variation in calculated accretion efficiency, with values exceeding the standard range of $0.038 < \epsilon < 0.42$. This discrepancy is especially pronounced in high redshift supermassive black holes, necessitating the development of a comprehensive model that can address the accretion efficiency for supermassive black holes in both the low and high redshift ranges. The selection effect was removed from model construction by creating a flux- and volume-limited sample, as the range of values for estimating the accretion efficiency factor varied through different redshifts. In this study, we have focused on low redshift ($z < 0.5$) Palomar-Green quasars (79 quasars) and high redshift ($z \geq 3$) quasars with standard disks from the flux- and volume-limited QUOTAS+QuasarNET dataset (75 quasars) to establish a model for accretion efficiency. By considering the QUOTAS+QuasarNET+DL11 dataset, a peak can be seen around $z \sim 2.708$, and it seems to be related to the peak of the star formation rate ($1 < z_{SFR} < 3$). Consequently, the observed maximum and minimum values of accretion efficiency in standard disks, through the considered bond (3$\sigma$), display a significantly wider range than previously noted and differentiate over time. In redshifts higher than 2.708, the accretion efficiency shows patterns of increase as redshift decreases, while in redshifts lower than 2.708, accretion efficiency is seen to decrease with reducing redshift. This result can potentially lead to a more accurate correlation between the star formation rate in quasars and their relationship with the mass of the central supermassive black holes with a more comprehensive disk model in future studies.
Comments: 26 pages, 5 figures, discussion extended
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:2405.03240 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:2405.03240v2 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.03240
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Javad Taghizadeh Firouzjaee [view email]
[v1] Mon, 6 May 2024 07:50:28 UTC (145 KB)
[v2] Tue, 29 Oct 2024 08:13:19 UTC (162 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Accretion Efficiency Evolution of Central Supermassive Black Holes in Quasars, by Arta Khosravi and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-05
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
gr-qc

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack