Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2404.13623

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Physics Education

arXiv:2404.13623 (physics)
[Submitted on 21 Apr 2024]

Title:Research in teaching and learning sequence design. To what extent do designers theoretical orientations about learning and the nature of science shape design decisions

Authors:Jenaro Guisasola, Kristina Zuza, Jaume Ametller, Paulo Sarriugarte
View a PDF of the paper titled Research in teaching and learning sequence design. To what extent do designers theoretical orientations about learning and the nature of science shape design decisions, by Jenaro Guisasola and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Over the last three decades, various didactic proposals have been published in an attempt to connect theory and research findings with the design of Teaching-Learning Sequences (TLS) in various contexts. Many studies have analysed the process of designing teaching-learning sequences as a research activity. This line of research aims to increase the impact and transferability of educational practice.
However, the information usually provided about the relation between the theory and research findings with the design of the TLS is insufficiently detailed to provide the basis for a critique. Furthermore, not all TLS proposals include evaluation in terms of learning outcomes and very rarely are these learning outcomes specifically related to the design process. This lack of detailed information on the design and evaluation of proposed TLS makes it difficult to properly assess their potential effectiveness or to systematically discuss and improve their design. In this chapter we want to contribute to make the rationale for design decisions explicit. The aim of this paper is to describe in detail how the theoretical orientations of designers of teaching materials towards cognition and learning can shape the structure and pedagogical strategies of the resulting TLS. We will analyse the relationship of two design tools (Epistemological analysis and Learning demands) to theoretical assumptions about learning and the nature of science. We want to highlight the benefits of reflecting on and discussing theoretical elements and their links to design decisions, which makes TLS design more productive on a practical level to broaden the teaching and learning perspectives of TLS. Finally, we will explore the question to what extent the theoretical orientations of curriculum designers towards cognition and learning can influence the structure and pedagogical strategies of the resulting TLS
Subjects: Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2404.13623 [physics.ed-ph]
  (or arXiv:2404.13623v1 [physics.ed-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.13623
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jenaro Guisasola [view email]
[v1] Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:28:05 UTC (563 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Research in teaching and learning sequence design. To what extent do designers theoretical orientations about learning and the nature of science shape design decisions, by Jenaro Guisasola and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.ed-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-04
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack