Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2403.07835

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Systems and Control

arXiv:2403.07835 (eess)
[Submitted on 12 Mar 2024 (v1), last revised 24 Jun 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:An Approach to Evaluate Modeling Adequacy for Small-Signal Stability Analysis of IBR-related SSOs in Multimachine Systems

Authors:Lilan Karunaratne, Nilanjan Ray Chaudhuri, Amirthagunaraj Yogarathnam, Meng Yue
View a PDF of the paper titled An Approach to Evaluate Modeling Adequacy for Small-Signal Stability Analysis of IBR-related SSOs in Multimachine Systems, by Lilan Karunaratne and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Time-varying phasor-based analysis of subsynchronous oscillations (SSOs) involving grid-following converters (GFLCs) and its benchmarking with electromagnetic transient (EMT) models have so far been restricted to highly simplified grid models with constant voltage sources behind series R-L circuits. In this paper, modeling adequacy of bulk power systems with synchronous generators (SGs), transmission systems, loads, and GFLCs are considered. To this end, we revisit the notions of time-varying phasor calculus, highlighting the distinction between space-phasor-calculus (SPC) and two often interchangeably used frameworks namely baseband-abc and generalized averaging. We present the models of grids in SPC framework that include transmission line dynamics, load dynamics, and SG stator transients. Next, we propose a generic approach to study modeling adequacy in small-signal sense by (a) identifying critical modes through eigenvalue and singular value analysis followed by (b) using weighted maximum singular value error magnitudes as metrics, and (c) further cross-validation. Using a modified 4-machine IEEE benchmark model with up to 3 GFLCs we show that SPC framework can be used for analysis of SSOs. Further, we consider the quasistationary phasor calculus (QPC) framework that neglects transmission line, load, and SG stator dynamics to show its adequacy in SSO modeling and analysis. Time-domain and frequency-domain results with EMT models are also presented.
Comments: 10 pages, 21 figures
Subjects: Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2403.07835 [eess.SY]
  (or arXiv:2403.07835v2 [eess.SY] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.07835
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Lilan Karunaratne [view email]
[v1] Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:18:33 UTC (3,300 KB)
[v2] Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:15:16 UTC (3,761 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled An Approach to Evaluate Modeling Adequacy for Small-Signal Stability Analysis of IBR-related SSOs in Multimachine Systems, by Lilan Karunaratne and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
eess.SY
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SY
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack