Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2403.00454

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Social and Information Networks

arXiv:2403.00454 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Mar 2024]

Title:Shorts vs. Regular Videos on YouTube: A Comparative Analysis of User Engagement and Content Creation Trends

Authors:Caroline Violot (University of Lausanne), Tuğrulcan Elmas (Indiana University Bloomington), Igor Bilogrevic (Google), Mathias Humbert (University of Lausanne)
View a PDF of the paper titled Shorts vs. Regular Videos on YouTube: A Comparative Analysis of User Engagement and Content Creation Trends, by Caroline Violot (University of Lausanne) and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:YouTube introduced the Shorts video format in 2021, allowing users to upload short videos that are prominently displayed on its website and app. Despite having such a large visual footprint, there are no studies to date that have looked at the impact Shorts introduction had on the production and consumption of content on YouTube. This paper presents the first comparative analysis of YouTube Shorts versus regular videos with respect to user engagement (i.e., views, likes, and comments), content creation frequency and video categories. We collected a dataset containing information about 70k channels that posted at least one Short, and we analyzed the metadata of all the videos (9.9M Shorts and 6.9M regular videos) they uploaded between January 2021 and December 2022, spanning a two-year period including the introduction of Shorts. Our longitudinal analysis shows that content creators consistently increased the frequency of Shorts production over this period, especially for newly-created channels, which surpassed that of regular videos. We also observe that Shorts target mostly entertainment categories, while regular videos cover a wide variety of categories. In general, Shorts attract more views and likes per view than regular videos, but attract less comments per view. However, Shorts do not outperform regular videos in the education and political categories as much as they do in other categories. Our study contributes to understanding social media dynamics, to quantifying the spread of short-form content, and to motivating future research on its impact on society.
Comments: 11 pages, 9 figures, to be published in the proceedings of ACM Web Science Conference 2024 (WEBSCI24)
Subjects: Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
Cite as: arXiv:2403.00454 [cs.SI]
  (or arXiv:2403.00454v1 [cs.SI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.00454
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3614419.3644023
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Caroline Violot [view email]
[v1] Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:20:54 UTC (2,065 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Shorts vs. Regular Videos on YouTube: A Comparative Analysis of User Engagement and Content Creation Trends, by Caroline Violot (University of Lausanne) and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.SI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-03
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack