Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2401.04051

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2401.04051 (cs)
[Submitted on 8 Jan 2024]

Title:Empirical Analysis of Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Large Pre-Trained Language Models

Authors:Nigel Doering, Cyril Gorlla, Trevor Tuttle, Adhvaith Vijay
View a PDF of the paper titled Empirical Analysis of Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Large Pre-Trained Language Models, by Nigel Doering and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Fine-tuning large pre-trained language models for downstream tasks remains a critical challenge in natural language processing. This paper presents an empirical analysis comparing two efficient fine-tuning methods - BitFit and adapter modules - to standard full model fine-tuning. Experiments conducted on GLUE benchmark datasets (MRPC, COLA, STS-B) reveal several key insights. The BitFit approach, which trains only bias terms and task heads, matches full fine-tuning performance across varying amounts of training data and time constraints. It demonstrates remarkable stability even with only 30\% of data, outperforming full fine-tuning at intermediate data levels. Adapter modules exhibit high variability, with inconsistent gains over default models. The findings indicate BitFit offers an attractive balance between performance and parameter efficiency. Our work provides valuable perspectives on model tuning, emphasizing robustness and highlighting BitFit as a promising alternative for resource-constrained or streaming task settings. The analysis offers actionable guidelines for efficient adaptation of large pre-trained models, while illustrating open challenges in stabilizing techniques like adapter modules.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2401.04051 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2401.04051v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.04051
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Cyril Gorlla [view email]
[v1] Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:44:43 UTC (457 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Empirical Analysis of Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods for Large Pre-Trained Language Models, by Nigel Doering and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack