Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2401.00593

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Information Theory

arXiv:2401.00593 (cs)
[Submitted on 31 Dec 2023 (v1), last revised 8 Apr 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Simplicity bias, algorithmic probability, and the random logistic map

Authors:Boumediene Hamzi, Kamaludin Dingle
View a PDF of the paper titled Simplicity bias, algorithmic probability, and the random logistic map, by Boumediene Hamzi and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Simplicity bias is an intriguing phenomenon prevalent in various input-output maps, characterized by a preference for simpler, more regular, or symmetric outputs. Notably, these maps typically feature high-probability outputs with simple patterns, whereas complex patterns are exponentially less probable. This bias has been extensively examined and attributed to principles derived from algorithmic information theory and algorithmic probability. In a significant advancement, it has been demonstrated that the renowned logistic map and other one-dimensional maps exhibit simplicity bias when conceptualized as input-output systems. Building upon this work, our research delves into the manifestations of simplicity bias within the random logistic map, specifically focusing on scenarios involving additive noise.
We discover that simplicity bias is observable in the random logistic map for specific ranges of $\mu$ and noise magnitudes. Additionally, we find that this bias persists even with the introduction of small measurement noise, though it diminishes as noise levels increase. Our studies also revisit the phenomenon of noise-induced chaos, particularly when $\mu=3.83$, revealing its characteristics through complexity-probability plots. Intriguingly, we employ the logistic map to illustrate a paradoxical aspect of data analysis: more data adhering to a consistent trend can occasionally lead to \emph{reduced} confidence in extrapolation predictions, challenging conventional wisdom.
We propose that adopting a probability-complexity perspective in analyzing dynamical systems could significantly enrich statistical learning theories related to series prediction and analysis. This approach not only facilitates a deeper understanding of simplicity bias and its implications but also paves the way for novel methodologies in forecasting complex systems behavior.
Subjects: Information Theory (cs.IT); Dynamical Systems (math.DS); Chaotic Dynamics (nlin.CD); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2401.00593 [cs.IT]
  (or arXiv:2401.00593v2 [cs.IT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.00593
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29746.79048
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Boumediene Hamzi [view email]
[v1] Sun, 31 Dec 2023 22:08:34 UTC (1,647 KB)
[v2] Mon, 8 Apr 2024 23:32:29 UTC (1,660 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Simplicity bias, algorithmic probability, and the random logistic map, by Boumediene Hamzi and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.IT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-01
Change to browse by:
cs
math
math.DS
math.IT
nlin
nlin.CD
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack