Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2310.15402

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

arXiv:2310.15402 (eess)
[Submitted on 23 Oct 2023 (v1), last revised 23 Jul 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Towards contrast-agnostic soft segmentation of the spinal cord

Authors:Sandrine Bédard, Enamundram Naga Karthik, Charidimos Tsagkas, Emanuele Pravatà, Cristina Granziera, Andrew Smith, Kenneth Arnold Weber II, Julien Cohen-Adad
View a PDF of the paper titled Towards contrast-agnostic soft segmentation of the spinal cord, by Sandrine B\'edard and 7 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Spinal cord segmentation is clinically relevant and is notably used to compute spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) for the diagnosis and monitoring of cord compression or neurodegenerative diseases such as multiple sclerosis. While several semi and automatic methods exist, one key limitation remains: the segmentation depends on the MRI contrast, resulting in different CSA across contrasts. This is partly due to the varying appearance of the boundary between the spinal cord and the cerebrospinal fluid that depends on the sequence and acquisition parameters. This contrast-sensitive CSA adds variability in multi-center studies where protocols can vary, reducing the sensitivity to detect subtle atrophies. Moreover, existing methods enhance the CSA variability by training one model per contrast, while also producing binary masks that do not account for partial volume effects. In this work, we present a deep learning-based method that produces soft segmentations of the spinal cord. Using the Spine Generic Public Database of healthy participants ($\text{n}=267$; $\text{contrasts}=6$), we first generated participant-wise soft ground truth (GT) by averaging the binary segmentations across all 6 contrasts. These soft GT, along with aggressive data augmentation and a regression-based loss function, were used to train a U-Net model for spinal cord segmentation. We evaluated our model against state-of-the-art methods and performed ablation studies involving different loss functions and domain generalization methods. Our results show that using the soft segmentations along with a regression loss function reduces CSA variability ($p < 0.05$, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The proposed spinal cord segmentation model generalizes better than the state-of-the-art methods amongst unseen datasets, vendors, contrasts, and pathologies (compression, lesions), while accounting for partial volume effects.
Comments: Revision Submitted to Medical Image Analysis
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2310.15402 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2310.15402v2 [eess.IV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.15402
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2025.103473
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Enamundram Naga Karthik [view email]
[v1] Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:15:28 UTC (19,251 KB)
[v2] Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:12:41 UTC (21,050 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Towards contrast-agnostic soft segmentation of the spinal cord, by Sandrine B\'edard and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
eess.IV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-10
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack