Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2310.03654

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:2310.03654 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 5 Oct 2023]

Title:Investigating Gaia EDR3 parallax systematics using asteroseismology of Cool Giant Stars observed by Kepler, K2, and TESS II. Deciphering Gaia parallax systematics using red clump stars

Authors:Saniya Khan, Richard I. Anderson, Andrea Miglio, Benoît Mosser, Yvonne P. Elsworth
View a PDF of the paper titled Investigating Gaia EDR3 parallax systematics using asteroseismology of Cool Giant Stars observed by Kepler, K2, and TESS II. Deciphering Gaia parallax systematics using red clump stars, by Saniya Khan and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We analyse Gaia EDR3 parallax systematics as a function of magnitude and sky location using a recently published catalogue of 12,500 asteroseismic red-giant star distances. We selected ~ 3500 red clump (RC) stars of similar chemical composition as the optimal subsample for this purpose. We perform a detailed assessment of systematic uncertainties relevant for parallax offset estimation based on the asteroseismic distances. Following this assessment, we adopt for our baseline analysis the asteroseismic parameters measured as in Elsworth et al. (2020), spectroscopy from APOGEE (DR17), and we further restrict the sample to low-extinction RC stars with quality astrometric solutions from Gaia EDR3. We then investigated both the parallax offset relative to the published Gaia EDR3 parallaxes and the residual parallax offset after correcting Gaia EDR3 parallaxes following Lindegren et al. (2021).
We find residual parallax offsets very close to zero (-1.6 +/- 0.5 (stat.) +/- 10 (syst.) muas) for stars fainter than G > 11 mag in the initial Kepler field. For 17 K2 campaigns in the same magnitude range, the residual parallax offset is +16.5 +/- 1.7 (stat.) +/- 10 (syst.) muas. At brighter magnitudes (G <= 11 mag), we find inconsistent residual parallax offsets between the Kepler field, 17 K2 campaigns, and the TESS southern continuous viewing zone, with differences of up to 60 muas. This suggests a significant dependence on sky location at bright magnitudes due to the lack of bright physical pairs available for determining the parallax offset corrections. Finally, we estimate the absolute magnitude of the RC and obtain M_Ks^RC = -1.650 +/- 0.025 mag in the 2MASS Ks-band and M_G^RC = (0.432 +/- 0.004) - (0.821 +/- 0.033) (Teff [K] - 4800K)/1000K [mag] in the Gaia G-band.
Comments: 12 pages, 10 figures, resubmitted to A&A (shortened abstract)
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
Cite as: arXiv:2310.03654 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:2310.03654v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.03654
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 680, A105 (2023)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347919
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Saniya Khan [view email]
[v1] Thu, 5 Oct 2023 16:31:27 UTC (16,395 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Investigating Gaia EDR3 parallax systematics using asteroseismology of Cool Giant Stars observed by Kepler, K2, and TESS II. Deciphering Gaia parallax systematics using red clump stars, by Saniya Khan and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-10
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack