Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2308.05858

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2308.05858 (stat)
This paper has been withdrawn by Klaus Mosegaard
[Submitted on 10 Aug 2023 (v1), last revised 19 Nov 2024 (this version, v3)]

Title:Inconsistency and Acausality of Model Selection in Bayesian Inverse Problems

Authors:Klaus Mosegaard
View a PDF of the paper titled Inconsistency and Acausality of Model Selection in Bayesian Inverse Problems, by Klaus Mosegaard
No PDF available, click to view other formats
Abstract:Bayesian inference paradigms are regarded as powerful tools for solution of inverse problems. However, when applied to inverse problems in physical sciences, Bayesian formulations suffer from a number of inconsistencies that are often overlooked. A well known, but mostly neglected, difficulty is connected to the notion of conditional probability densities. Borel, and later Kolmogorov's (1933/1956), found that the traditional definition of conditional densities is incomplete: In different parameterizations it leads to different results. We will show an example where two apparently correct procedures applied to the same problem lead to two widely different results. Another type of inconsistency involves violation of causality. This problem is found in model selection strategies in Bayesian inversion, such as Hierarchical Bayes and Trans-Dimensional Inversion where so-called hyperparameters are included as variables to control either the number (or type) of unknowns, or the prior uncertainties on data or model parameters. For Hierarchical Bayes we demonstrate that the calculated 'prior' distributions of data or model parameters are not prior-, but posterior information. In fact, the calculated 'standard deviations' of the data are a measure of the inability of the forward function to model the data, rather than uncertainties of the data. For trans-dimensional inverse problems we show that the so-called evidence is, in fact, not a measure of the success of fitting the data for the given choice (or number) of parameters, as often claimed. We also find that the notion of Natural Parsimony is ill-defined, because of its dependence on the parameter prior. Based on this study, we find that careful rethinking of Bayesian inversion practices is required, with special emphasis on ways of avoiding the Borel-Kolmogorov inconsistency, and on the way we interpret model selection results.
Comments: This article is withdrawn because it is obsolete after a new and significantly different article about Bayesian Inference by Klaus Mosegaard and Andrew Cutis, entitled "Inconsistency and Acausality in Bayesian Inference for Physical Problems", has been submitted. The new article reveals more profound and serious problems with Bayesian methods than exposed in the withdrawn article
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2308.05858 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2308.05858v3 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.05858
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Klaus Mosegaard [view email]
[v1] Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:17:08 UTC (938 KB)
[v2] Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:04:47 UTC (973 KB)
[v3] Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:33:05 UTC (1 KB) (withdrawn)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Inconsistency and Acausality of Model Selection in Bayesian Inverse Problems, by Klaus Mosegaard
  • Withdrawn
No license for this version due to withdrawn
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-08
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack