Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > quant-ph > arXiv:2308.02769

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantum Physics

arXiv:2308.02769 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 5 Aug 2023 (v1), last revised 18 Oct 2023 (this version, v2)]

Title:Q-Pandora Unboxed: Characterizing Noise Resilience of Quantum Error Correction Codes

Authors:Avimita Chatterjee, Subrata Das, Swaroop Ghosh
View a PDF of the paper titled Q-Pandora Unboxed: Characterizing Noise Resilience of Quantum Error Correction Codes, by Avimita Chatterjee and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Quantum error correction codes (QECCs) are critical for realizing reliable quantum computing by protecting fragile quantum states against noise and errors. However, limited research has analyzed the noise resilience of QECCs to help select optimal codes. This paper conducts a comprehensive study analyzing two QECCs - rotated and unrotated surface codes - under different error types and noise models using simulations. Among them, rotated surface codes perform best with higher thresholds attributed to simplicity and lower qubit overhead. The noise threshold, or the point at which QECCs become ineffective, surpasses the error rate found in contemporary quantum processors. When confronting quantum hardware where a specific error or noise model is dominant, a discernible hierarchy emerges for surface code implementation in terms of resource demand. This ordering is consistently observed across unrotated, and rotated surface codes. Our noise model analysis ranks the code-capacity model as the most pessimistic and circuit-level model as the most realistic. The study maps error thresholds, revealing surface code's advantage over modern quantum processors. It also shows higher code distances and rounds consistently improve performance. However, excessive distances needlessly increase qubit overhead. By matching target logical error rates and feasible number of qubits to optimal surface code parameters, our study demonstrates the necessity of tailoring these codes to balance reliability and qubit resources. Conclusively, we underscore the significance of addressing the notable challenges associated with surface code overheads and qubit improvements.
Comments: 15 pages; 9 figures; 3 tables
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2308.02769 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2308.02769v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.02769
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084555
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Avimita Chatterjee [view email]
[v1] Sat, 5 Aug 2023 02:24:55 UTC (8,192 KB)
[v2] Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:11:44 UTC (7,391 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Q-Pandora Unboxed: Characterizing Noise Resilience of Quantum Error Correction Codes, by Avimita Chatterjee and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-08

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack