Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2307.12676

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2307.12676 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Jul 2023 (v1), last revised 29 Aug 2023 (this version, v5)]

Title:Few-shot $\mathbf{1/a}$ Anomalies Feedback : Damage Vision Mining Opportunity and Embedding Feature Imbalance

Authors:Takato Yasuno
View a PDF of the paper titled Few-shot $\mathbf{1/a}$ Anomalies Feedback : Damage Vision Mining Opportunity and Embedding Feature Imbalance, by Takato Yasuno
View PDF
Abstract:Over the past decade, previous balanced datasets have been used to advance deep learning algorithms for industrial applications. In urban infrastructures and living environments, damage data mining cannot avoid imbalanced data issues because of rare unseen events and the high-quality status of improved operations. For visual inspection, the deteriorated class acquired from the surface of concrete and steel components are occasionally imbalanced. From numerous related surveys, we conclude that imbalanced data problems can be categorised into four types: 1) missing range of target and label valuables, 2) majority-minority class imbalance, 3) foreground background of spatial imbalance, and 4) long-tailed class of pixel-wise imbalance. Since 2015, many imbalanced studies have been conducted using deep-learning approaches, including regression, image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. However, anomaly detection for imbalanced data is not well known. In this study, we highlight a one-class anomaly detection application, whether anomalous class or not, and demonstrate clear examples of imbalanced vision datasets: medical disease, hazardous behaviour, material deterioration, plant disease, river sludge, and disaster damage. We provide key results on the advantage of damage-vision mining, hypothesising that the more effective the range of the positive ratio, the higher the accuracy gain of the anomalies feedback. In our imbalanced studies, compared with the balanced case with a positive ratio of $1/1$, we find that there is an applicable positive ratio $1/a$ where the accuracy is consistently high. However, the extremely imbalanced range is from one shot to $1/2a$, the accuracy of which is inferior to that of the applicable ratio. In contrast, with a positive ratio ranging over $2/a$, it shifts in the over-mining phase without an effective gain in accuracy.
Comments: 34 pages, 53 figures, 28 tables
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
ACM classes: I.2.10; I.5.4
Cite as: arXiv:2307.12676 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2307.12676v5 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.12676
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Takato Yasuno [view email]
[v1] Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:30:54 UTC (10,366 KB)
[v2] Fri, 4 Aug 2023 04:31:25 UTC (13,806 KB)
[v3] Tue, 8 Aug 2023 02:32:24 UTC (21,818 KB)
[v4] Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:15:05 UTC (33,104 KB)
[v5] Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:48:37 UTC (33,104 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Few-shot $\mathbf{1/a}$ Anomalies Feedback : Damage Vision Mining Opportunity and Embedding Feature Imbalance, by Takato Yasuno
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-07
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack