Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > econ > arXiv:2305.11350

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Economics > Theoretical Economics

arXiv:2305.11350 (econ)
This paper has been withdrawn by Maxwell Allman
[Submitted on 18 May 2023 (v1), last revised 5 Sep 2023 (this version, v2)]

Title:Interviewing Matching in Random Markets

Authors:Maxwell Allman, Itai Ashlagi
View a PDF of the paper titled Interviewing Matching in Random Markets, by Maxwell Allman and 1 other authors
No PDF available, click to view other formats
Abstract:In many centralized labor markets candidates interview with potential employers before matches are formed through a clearinghouse One prominent example is the market for medical residencies and fellowships, which in recent years has had a large increase in the number of interviews. There have been numerous efforts to reduce the cost of interviewing in these markets using a variety of signalling mechanisms, however, the theoretical properties of these mechanisms have not been systematically studied in models with rich preferences. In this paper we give theoretical guarantees for a variety of mechanisms, finding that these mechanisms must properly balance competition.
We consider a random market in which agents' latent preferences are based on observed qualities, personal taste and (ex post) interview shocks and assume that following an interview mechanism a final stable match is generated with respect to preferences over interview partners. We study a novel many-to-many interview match mechanism to coordinate interviews and that with relatively few interviews, when suitably designed, the interview match yields desirable properties.
We find that under the interview matching mechanism with a limit of $k$ interviews per candidate and per position, the fraction of positions that are unfilled vanishes quickly with $k$. Moreover the ex post efficiency grows rapidly with $k$, and reporting sincere pre-interview preferences to this mechanism is an $\epsilon$-Bayes Nash equilibrium. Finally, we compare the performance of the interview match to other signalling and coordination mechanisms from the literature.
Comments: Error in proof of Lemma 1 leaves a step unexplained, proof needs to be corrected and made more rigorous
Subjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Cite as: arXiv:2305.11350 [econ.TH]
  (or arXiv:2305.11350v2 [econ.TH] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.11350
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Maxwell Allman [view email]
[v1] Thu, 18 May 2023 23:56:47 UTC (3,370 KB)
[v2] Tue, 5 Sep 2023 22:20:04 UTC (1 KB) (withdrawn)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Interviewing Matching in Random Markets, by Maxwell Allman and 1 other authors
  • Withdrawn
No license for this version due to withdrawn
Current browse context:
econ.TH
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-05
Change to browse by:
econ

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack