Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2305.08566

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2305.08566 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 May 2023 (v1), last revised 26 May 2023 (this version, v4)]

Title:NLG Evaluation Metrics Beyond Correlation Analysis: An Empirical Metric Preference Checklist

Authors:Iftitahu Ni'mah, Meng Fang, Vlado Menkovski, Mykola Pechenizkiy
View a PDF of the paper titled NLG Evaluation Metrics Beyond Correlation Analysis: An Empirical Metric Preference Checklist, by Iftitahu Ni'mah and Meng Fang and Vlado Menkovski and Mykola Pechenizkiy
View PDF
Abstract:In this study, we analyze automatic evaluation metrics for Natural Language Generation (NLG), specifically task-agnostic metrics and human-aligned metrics. Task-agnostic metrics, such as Perplexity, BLEU, BERTScore, are cost-effective and highly adaptable to diverse NLG tasks, yet they have a weak correlation with human. Human-aligned metrics (CTC, CtrlEval, UniEval) improves correlation level by incorporating desirable human-like qualities as training objective. However, their effectiveness at discerning system-level performance and quality of system outputs remain unclear.
We present metric preference checklist as a framework to assess the effectiveness of automatic metrics in three NLG tasks: Text Summarization, Dialogue Response Generation, and Controlled Generation. Our proposed framework provides access: (i) for verifying whether automatic metrics are faithful to human preference, regardless of their correlation level to human; and (ii) for inspecting the strengths and limitations of NLG systems via pairwise evaluation. We show that automatic metrics provide a better guidance than human on discriminating system-level performance in Text Summarization and Controlled Generation tasks. We also show that multi-aspect human-aligned metric (UniEval) is not necessarily dominant over single-aspect human-aligned metrics (CTC, CtrlEval) and task-agnostic metrics (BLEU, BERTScore), particularly in Controlled Generation tasks.
Comments: To appear at ACL 2023 Toronto (main conference). 9 pages (main), 1 page for Limitations and Ethics, 11 pages for Appendix
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2305.08566 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2305.08566v4 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.08566
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Iftitahu Ni'mah [view email]
[v1] Mon, 15 May 2023 11:51:55 UTC (7,554 KB)
[v2] Wed, 17 May 2023 16:09:51 UTC (7,554 KB)
[v3] Thu, 18 May 2023 13:20:19 UTC (16,158 KB)
[v4] Fri, 26 May 2023 07:30:35 UTC (8,090 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled NLG Evaluation Metrics Beyond Correlation Analysis: An Empirical Metric Preference Checklist, by Iftitahu Ni'mah and Meng Fang and Vlado Menkovski and Mykola Pechenizkiy
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-05
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack