close this message
arXiv smileybones

Happy Birthday to arXiv!

It's our birthday — woohoo! On August 14th, 1991, the very first paper was submitted to arXiv. That's 34 years of open science! Give today and help support arXiv for many birthdays to come.

Give a gift!
Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2304.02193

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Data Structures and Algorithms

arXiv:2304.02193 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Apr 2023 (v1), last revised 22 Apr 2024 (this version, v3)]

Title:Folklore Sampling is Optimal for Exact Hopsets: Confirming the $\sqrt{n}$ Barrier

Authors:Greg Bodwin, Gary Hoppenworth
View a PDF of the paper titled Folklore Sampling is Optimal for Exact Hopsets: Confirming the $\sqrt{n}$ Barrier, by Greg Bodwin and Gary Hoppenworth
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:For a graph $G$, a $D$-diameter-reducing exact hopset is a small set of additional edges $H$ that, when added to $G$, maintains its graph metric but guarantees that all node pairs have a shortest path in $G \cup H$ using at most $D$ edges. A shortcut set is the analogous concept for reachability. These objects have been studied since the early '90s due to applications in parallel, distributed, dynamic, and streaming graph algorithms.
For most of their history, the state-of-the-art construction for either object was a simple folklore algorithm, based on randomly sampling nodes to hit long paths in the graph. However, recent breakthroughs of Kogan and Parter [SODA '22] and Bernstein and Wein [SODA '23] have finally improved over the folklore diameter bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/2})$ for shortcut sets and for $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate hopsets. For both objects it is now known that one can use $O(n)$ hop-edges to reduce diameter to $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/3})$. The only setting where folklore sampling remains unimproved is for exact hopsets. Can these improvements be continued?
We settle this question negatively by constructing graphs on which any exact hopset of $O(n)$ edges has diameter $\widetilde{\Omega}(n^{1/2})$. This improves on the previous lower bound of $\widetilde{\Omega}(n^{1/3})$ by Kogan and Parter [FOCS '22]. Using similar ideas, we also polynomially improve the current lower bounds for shortcut sets, constructing graphs on which any shortcut set of $O(n)$ edges reduces diameter to $\widetilde{\Omega}(n^{1/4})$. This improves on the previous lower bound of $\Omega(n^{1/6})$ by Huang and Pettie [SIAM J. Disc. Math. '18]. We also extend our constructions to provide lower bounds against $O(p)$-size exact hopsets and shortcut sets for other values of $p$; in particular, we show that folklore sampling is near-optimal for exact hopsets in the entire range of $p \in [1, n^2]$.
Comments: Incorporated reviewer feedback, FOCS 2023
Subjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:2304.02193 [cs.DS]
  (or arXiv:2304.02193v3 [cs.DS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02193
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Gary Hoppenworth [view email]
[v1] Wed, 5 Apr 2023 02:18:09 UTC (82 KB)
[v2] Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:34:52 UTC (3,251 KB)
[v3] Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:17:00 UTC (3,252 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Folklore Sampling is Optimal for Exact Hopsets: Confirming the $\sqrt{n}$ Barrier, by Greg Bodwin and Gary Hoppenworth
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-04
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack