Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > gr-qc > arXiv:2303.14251v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

arXiv:2303.14251v1 (gr-qc)
[Submitted on 24 Mar 2023 (this version), latest version 14 Aug 2023 (v2)]

Title:Tracking the validity of the quasi-static and sub-horizon approximations in modified gravity

Authors:J. Bayron Orjuela-Quintana, Savvas Nesseris
View a PDF of the paper titled Tracking the validity of the quasi-static and sub-horizon approximations in modified gravity, by J. Bayron Orjuela-Quintana and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Within the framework of modified gravity, the quasi-static and sub-horizon approximations are widely used in analyses aiming to identify departures from the concordance model at late-times. Under these approximations, it is generally assumed that time derivatives are subdominant with respect to spatial derivatives given that the relevant physical modes are those well inside the Hubble radius. Here, in the context of the effective fluid approach applied to $f(R)$ theories, we put forward a new parameterization which allows us to obtain analytical expressions for the gravitational potentials, whence for the effective dark energy perturbations. In order to track the validity of the two aforementioned approximations, we compare our results and the standard results found in the literature against full numerical solutions for two well-known toy-models; namely, the designer ($f$DES) model and the Hu-Sawicki (HS) model. We find that: $i)$ the sub-horizon approximation can be safely applied for scales $k \gtrsim 200 H_0$, $ii)$ in this ``safety region'', the quasi-static approximation is a very accurate description of the late-time dynamics even when dark energy significantly contribute to the cosmic budget, $iii)$ some relevant terms were neglected in the standard procedure yielding to inaccurate results in some of the dark energy effective fluid quantities; e.g. the sound speed. Instead, our expressions show overall agreement with respect to the full solutions. Therefore, our results indirectly indicate that the effective fluid expressions derived for more general modified gravity theories, such as Horndeski, should be revisited.
Comments: 27 pages, 16 figures
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Report number: IFT-UAM/CSIC-23-27
Cite as: arXiv:2303.14251 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:2303.14251v1 [gr-qc] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.14251
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: John Bayron Orjuela Quintana [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:31:38 UTC (863 KB)
[v2] Mon, 14 Aug 2023 12:26:15 UTC (948 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Tracking the validity of the quasi-static and sub-horizon approximations in modified gravity, by J. Bayron Orjuela-Quintana and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
gr-qc
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.CO

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack