Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2303.03237

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Machine Learning

arXiv:2303.03237 (stat)
[Submitted on 6 Mar 2023 (v1), last revised 1 Aug 2023 (this version, v3)]

Title:Convergence Rates for Non-Log-Concave Sampling and Log-Partition Estimation

Authors:David Holzmüller, Francis Bach
View a PDF of the paper titled Convergence Rates for Non-Log-Concave Sampling and Log-Partition Estimation, by David Holzm\"uller and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Sampling from Gibbs distributions $p(x) \propto \exp(-V(x)/\varepsilon)$ and computing their log-partition function are fundamental tasks in statistics, machine learning, and statistical physics. However, while efficient algorithms are known for convex potentials $V$, the situation is much more difficult in the non-convex case, where algorithms necessarily suffer from the curse of dimensionality in the worst case. For optimization, which can be seen as a low-temperature limit of sampling, it is known that smooth functions $V$ allow faster convergence rates. Specifically, for $m$-times differentiable functions in $d$ dimensions, the optimal rate for algorithms with $n$ function evaluations is known to be $O(n^{-m/d})$, where the constant can potentially depend on $m, d$ and the function to be optimized. Hence, the curse of dimensionality can be alleviated for smooth functions at least in terms of the convergence rate. Recently, it has been shown that similarly fast rates can also be achieved with polynomial runtime $O(n^{3.5})$, where the exponent $3.5$ is independent of $m$ or $d$. Hence, it is natural to ask whether similar rates for sampling and log-partition computation are possible, and whether they can be realized in polynomial time with an exponent independent of $m$ and $d$. We show that the optimal rates for sampling and log-partition computation are sometimes equal and sometimes faster than for optimization. We then analyze various polynomial-time sampling algorithms, including an extension of a recent promising optimization approach, and find that they sometimes exhibit interesting behavior but no near-optimal rates. Our results also give further insights on the relation between sampling, log-partition, and optimization problems.
Comments: Changes in v3: Minor corrections and improvements. Plots can be reproduced using the code at this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Computation (stat.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:2303.03237 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:2303.03237v3 [stat.ML] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03237
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: David Holzmüller [view email]
[v1] Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:53:44 UTC (847 KB)
[v2] Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:06:32 UTC (847 KB)
[v3] Tue, 1 Aug 2023 13:09:53 UTC (847 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Convergence Rates for Non-Log-Concave Sampling and Log-Partition Estimation, by David Holzm\"uller and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ML
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
math
math.ST
stat
stat.CO
stat.TH

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack