Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2302.08526

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

arXiv:2302.08526 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 16 Feb 2023 (v1), last revised 30 Aug 2023 (this version, v2)]

Title:Importance nested sampling with normalising flows

Authors:Michael J. Williams, John Veitch, Chris Messenger
View a PDF of the paper titled Importance nested sampling with normalising flows, by Michael J. Williams and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We present an improved version of the nested sampling algorithm nessai in which the core algorithm is modified to use importance weights. In the modified algorithm, samples are drawn from a mixture of normalising flows and the requirement for samples to be independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) according to the prior is relaxed. Furthermore, it allows for samples to be added in any order, independently of a likelihood constraint, and for the evidence to be updated with batches of samples. We call the modified algorithm i-nessai. We first validate i-nessai using analytic likelihoods with known Bayesian evidences and show that the evidence estimates are unbiased in up to 32 dimensions. We compare i-nessai to standard nessai for the analytic likelihoods and the Rosenbrock likelihood, the results show that i-nessai is consistent with nessai whilst producing more precise evidence estimates. We then test i-nessai on 64 simulated gravitational-wave signals from binary black hole coalescence and show that it produces unbiased estimates of the parameters. We compare our results to those obtained using standard nessai and dynesty and find that i-nessai requires 2.68 and 13.3 times fewer likelihood evaluations to converge, respectively. We also test i-nessai of an 80-second simulated binary neutron star signal using a Reduced-Order-Quadrature (ROQ) basis and find that, on average, it converges in 24 minutes, whilst only requiring $1.01\times10^6$ likelihood evaluations compared to $1.42\times10^6$ for nessai and $4.30\times10^7$ for dynesty. These results demonstrate the i-nessai is consistent with nessai and dynesty whilst also being more efficient.
Comments: 41 pages, 12 figures, 2 tables, published in Machine Learning: Science and Technology, code available at this https URL, updated with accepted version
Subjects: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Report number: LIGO-P2200283
Cite as: arXiv:2302.08526 [astro-ph.IM]
  (or arXiv:2302.08526v2 [astro-ph.IM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.08526
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 4 035011 (2023)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/acd5aa
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Michael Williams [view email]
[v1] Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:00:10 UTC (2,839 KB)
[v2] Wed, 30 Aug 2023 13:38:40 UTC (2,796 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Importance nested sampling with normalising flows, by Michael J. Williams and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.IM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-02
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.HE
gr-qc

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack