close this message
arXiv smileybones

Happy Open Access Week from arXiv!

YOU make open access possible! Tell us why you support #openaccess and give to arXiv this week to help keep science open for all.

Donate!
Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2302.00397

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2302.00397 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Feb 2023]

Title:Chatbots for Robotic Process Automation: Investigating Perceived Trust and User Satisfaction

Authors:Alessandro Casadei, Stephan Schlögl, Markus Bergmann
View a PDF of the paper titled Chatbots for Robotic Process Automation: Investigating Perceived Trust and User Satisfaction, by Alessandro Casadei and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Driven by ongoing improvements in machine learning, chatbots have increasingly grown from experimental interface prototypes to reliable and robust tools for process automation. Building on these advances, companies have identified various application scenarios, where the automated processing of human language can help foster task efficiency. To this end, the use of chatbots may not only decrease costs, but it is also said to boost user satisfaction. People's intention to use and/or reuse said technology, however, is often dependent on less utilitarian factors. Particularly trust and respective task satisfaction count as relevant usage predictors. In this paper, we thus present work that aims to shed some light on these two variable constructs. We report on an experimental study ($n=277$), investigating four different human-chatbot interaction tasks. After each task, participants were asked to complete survey items on perceived trust, perceived task complexity and perceived task satisfaction. Results show that task complexity impacts negatively on both trust and satisfaction. To this end, higher complexity was associated particularly with those conversations that relied on broad, descriptive chatbot answers, while conversations that span over several short steps were perceived less complex, even when the overall conversation was eventually longer.
Comments: 6 pages
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2302.00397 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2302.00397v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.00397
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS56717.2022.9980826
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Stephan Schlögl PhD [view email]
[v1] Wed, 1 Feb 2023 12:21:16 UTC (339 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Chatbots for Robotic Process Automation: Investigating Perceived Trust and User Satisfaction, by Alessandro Casadei and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-02
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status