Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > hep-th > arXiv:2301.13029

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

High Energy Physics - Theory

arXiv:2301.13029 (hep-th)
[Submitted on 30 Jan 2023 (v1), last revised 29 May 2023 (this version, v4)]

Title:Determining the normalization of the quantum field theory vacuum, with implications for quantum gravity

Authors:Philip D. Mannheim
View a PDF of the paper titled Determining the normalization of the quantum field theory vacuum, with implications for quantum gravity, by Philip D. Mannheim
View PDF
Abstract:In a standard quantum field theory the norm $\langle \Omega\vert \Omega\rangle$ of the vacuum state is taken to be finite. In this paper we provide a procedure, based on constructing an equivalent wave mechanics, for determining whether or not $\langle \Omega\vert \Omega\rangle$ actually is finite. We provide an example based on a second-order plus fourth-order scalar field theory, a prototype for quantum gravity, in which it is not. In this example the Minkowski path integral with a real measure diverges though the Euclidean path integral does not. Thus in this example contributions from the Wick rotation contour cannot be ignored. Since $\langle \Omega\vert \Omega\rangle$ is not finite, use of the standard Feynman rules is not valid. And while these rules not only lead to states with negative norm, they in fact lead to states with infinite negative norm. However, if the fields in that theory are continued into the complex plane, we show that then there is a domain in the complex plane known as a Stokes wedge in which one can define an appropriate time-independent, positive and finite inner product, viz. the $\langle L\vert R\rangle$ overlap of left-eigenstates and right-eigenstates of the Hamiltonian; with the vacuum state then being normalizable, and with there being no states with negative or infinite $\langle L\vert R\rangle$ norm. In this Stokes wedge it is the Euclidean path integral that diverges while the Minkowski path integral does not. The concerns that we raise in this paper only apply to bosons since the matrices associated with their creation and annihilation operators are infinite dimensional. Since the ones associated with fermions are finite dimensional, the fermion theory vacuum is automatically normalizable. Our results are relevant to the construction of a consistent, unitary and renormalizable quantum theory of gravity.
Comments: Expanded to 32 pages
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:2301.13029 [hep-th]
  (or arXiv:2301.13029v4 [hep-th] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.13029
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Philip D. Mannheim [view email]
[v1] Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:17:06 UTC (20 KB)
[v2] Wed, 1 Mar 2023 15:43:59 UTC (41 KB)
[v3] Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:08:15 UTC (50 KB)
[v4] Mon, 29 May 2023 00:12:09 UTC (50 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Determining the normalization of the quantum field theory vacuum, with implications for quantum gravity, by Philip D. Mannheim
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
hep-th
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-01
Change to browse by:
gr-qc

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack