Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2301.11386

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2301.11386 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Jan 2023]

Title:Task formulation for Extracting Social Determinants of Health from Clinical Narratives

Authors:Manabu Torii, Ian M. Finn, Son Doan, Paul Wang, Elly W. Yang, Daniel S. Zisook
View a PDF of the paper titled Task formulation for Extracting Social Determinants of Health from Clinical Narratives, by Manabu Torii and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Objective: The 2022 n2c2 NLP Challenge posed identification of social determinants of health (SDOH) in clinical narratives. We present three systems that we developed for the Challenge and discuss the distinctive task formulation used in each of the three systems. Materials and Methods: The first system identifies target pieces of information independently using machine learning classifiers. The second system uses a large language model (LLM) to extract complete structured outputs per document. The third system extracts candidate phrases using machine learning and identifies target relations with hand-crafted rules. Results: The three systems achieved F1 scores of 0.884, 0.831, and 0.663 in the Subtask A of the Challenge, which are ranked third, seventh, and eighth among the 15 participating teams. The review of the extraction results from our systems reveals characteristics of each approach and those of the SODH extraction task. Discussion: Phrases and relations annotated in the task is unique and diverse, not conforming to the conventional event extraction task. These annotations are difficult to model with limited training data. The system that extracts information independently, ignoring the annotated relations, achieves the highest F1 score. Meanwhile, LLM with its versatile capability achieves the high F1 score, while respecting the annotated relations. The rule-based system tackling relation extraction obtains the low F1 score, while it is the most explainable approach. Conclusion: The F1 scores of the three systems vary in this challenge setting, but each approach has advantages and disadvantages in a practical application. The selection of the approach depends not only on the F1 score but also on the requirements in the application.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
ACM classes: I.2.7
Cite as: arXiv:2301.11386 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2301.11386v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.11386
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Manabu Torii [view email]
[v1] Thu, 26 Jan 2023 20:00:54 UTC (568 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Task formulation for Extracting Social Determinants of Health from Clinical Narratives, by Manabu Torii and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-01
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack