Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2212.13439

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2212.13439 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 Dec 2022 (v1), last revised 10 Jan 2023 (this version, v2)]

Title:Robust Cross-vendor Mammographic Texture Models Using Augmentation-based Domain Adaptation for Long-term Breast Cancer Risk

Authors:Andreas D. Lauritzen, My Catarina von Euler-Chelpin, Elsebeth Lynge, Ilse Vejborg, Mads Nielsen, Nico Karssemeijer, Martin Lillholm
View a PDF of the paper titled Robust Cross-vendor Mammographic Texture Models Using Augmentation-based Domain Adaptation for Long-term Breast Cancer Risk, by Andreas D. Lauritzen and 6 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Purpose: Risk-stratified breast cancer screening might improve early detection and efficiency without comprising quality. However, modern mammography-based risk models do not ensure adaptation across vendor-domains and rely on cancer precursors, associated with short-term risk, which might limit long-term risk assessment. We report a cross-vendor mammographic texture model for long-term risk. Approach: The texture model was robustly trained using two systematically designed case-control datasets. Textural features, indicative of future breast cancer, were learned by excluding samples with diagnosed/potential malignancies from training. An augmentation-based domain adaption technique, based on flavorization of mammographic views, ensured generalization across vendor-domains. The model was validated in 66,607 consecutively screened Danish women with flavorized Siemens views and 25,706 Dutch women with Hologic-processed views. Performances were evaluated for interval cancers (IC) within two years from screening and long-term cancers (LTC) from two years after screening. The texture model was combined with established risk factors to flag 10% of women with the highest risk. Results: In Danish women, the texture model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.71 and 0.65 for ICs and LTCs, respectively. In Dutch women with Hologic-processed views, the AUCs were not different from AUCs in Danish women with flavorized views. The AUC for texture combined with established risk factors increased to 0.68 for LTCs. The 10% of women flagged as high-risk accounted for 25.5% of ICs and 24.8% of LTCs. Conclusions: The texture model robustly estimated long-term breast cancer risk while adapting to an unseen processed vendor-domain and identified a clinically relevant high-risk subgroup.
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2212.13439 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2212.13439v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.13439
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Andreas Lauritzen [view email]
[v1] Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:37:02 UTC (3,077 KB)
[v2] Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:06:38 UTC (3,742 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Robust Cross-vendor Mammographic Texture Models Using Augmentation-based Domain Adaptation for Long-term Breast Cancer Risk, by Andreas D. Lauritzen and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-12
Change to browse by:
cs
physics
physics.med-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack