Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2212.02285

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2212.02285 (physics)
[Submitted on 5 Dec 2022 (v1), last revised 16 Jan 2025 (this version, v3)]

Title:Realistic Total-Body J-PET Geometry Optimization -- Monte Carlo Study

Authors:Jakub Baran, Wojciech Krzemien, Lech Raczyński, Mateusz Bała, Aurelien Coussat, Szymon Parzych, Neha Chug, Eryk Czerwiński, Catalina Oana Curceanu, Meysam Dadgar, Kamil Dulski, Kavya Eliyan, Jan Gajewski, Aleksander Gajos, Beatrix Hiesmayr, Krzysztof Kacprzak, Łukasz Kapłon, Konrad Klimaszewski, Grzegorz Korcyl, Tomasz Kozik, Deepak Kumar, Szymon Niedźwiecki, Dominik Panek, Elena Perez del Rio, Antoni Ruciński, Sushil Sharma, Shivani, Roman Y. Shopa, Magdalena Skurzok, Ewa Stępień, Faranak Tayefiardebili, Keyvan Tayefiardebili, Wojciech Wiślicki, Paweł Moskal
View a PDF of the paper titled Realistic Total-Body J-PET Geometry Optimization -- Monte Carlo Study, by Jakub Baran and 33 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Total-Body PET is one of the most promising medical diagnostics modalities. The high sensitivity provided by Total-Body technology can be advantageous for novel tomography methods like positronium imaging. Several efforts are ongoing to lower the price of the TB-PET systems. Among the alternatives, the Jagiellonian PET (J-PET) technology, based on plastic scintillator strips, offers a low-cost alternative. The work aimed to compare five Total-Body J-PET geometries as a possible next generation J-PET scanner design. We present comparative studies of performance characteristics of the cost-effective Total-Body PET scanners using J-PET technology. We investigated in silico five Total-Body scanner geometries. Monte Carlo simulations of the XCAT phantom, the 2-meter sensitivity line source and positronium sensitivity phantoms were performed. We compared the sensitivity profiles for 2-gamma and 3-gamma tomography, relative cost of the setups and performed quantitative analysis of the reconstructed images. The analysis of the reconstructed XCAT images reveals the superiority of the seven-ring scanners over the three-ring setups. However, the three-ring scanners would be approximately 2-3 times cheaper. The peak sensitivity values for two-gamma vary from 20 to 34 cps/kBq. The sensitivity curves for the positronium tomography have a similar shape to the two-gamma sensitivity profiles. The peak values are lower compared to the two-gamma cases, from about 20-28 times, with a maximum of 1.66 cps/kBq. The results show the feasibility of multi-organ imaging of all the systems to be considered for the next generation of TB J-PET designs. The relative cost for all the scanners is about 10-4 times lower compared to the cost of the uExplorer. These properties coupled together with J-PET cost-effectiveness, make the J-PET technology an attractive solution for broad application in clinics.
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph); Instrumentation and Detectors (physics.ins-det)
Cite as: arXiv:2212.02285 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2212.02285v3 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.02285
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jakub Baran [view email]
[v1] Mon, 5 Dec 2022 14:08:16 UTC (10,322 KB)
[v2] Fri, 16 Feb 2024 08:03:49 UTC (4,519 KB)
[v3] Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:41:23 UTC (4,519 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Realistic Total-Body J-PET Geometry Optimization -- Monte Carlo Study, by Jakub Baran and 33 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-12
Change to browse by:
physics
physics.ins-det

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack