Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2211.06536

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2211.06536 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 Nov 2022]

Title:Improving the Efficiency of the PC Algorithm by Using Model-Based Conditional Independence Tests

Authors:Erica Cai, Andrew McGregor, David Jensen
View a PDF of the paper titled Improving the Efficiency of the PC Algorithm by Using Model-Based Conditional Independence Tests, by Erica Cai and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Learning causal structure is useful in many areas of artificial intelligence, including planning, robotics, and explanation. Constraint-based structure learning algorithms such as PC use conditional independence (CI) tests to infer causal structure. Traditionally, constraint-based algorithms perform CI tests with a preference for smaller-sized conditioning sets, partially because the statistical power of conventional CI tests declines rapidly as the size of the conditioning set increases. However, many modern conditional independence tests are model-based, and these tests use well-regularized models that maintain statistical power even with very large conditioning sets. This suggests an intriguing new strategy for constraint-based algorithms which may result in a reduction of the total number of CI tests performed: Test variable pairs with large conditioning sets first, as a pre-processing step that finds some conditional independencies quickly, before moving on to the more conventional strategy that favors small conditioning sets. We propose such a pre-processing step for the PC algorithm which relies on performing CI tests on a few randomly selected large conditioning sets. We perform an empirical analysis on directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) that correspond to real-world systems and both empirical and theoretical analyses for Erdős-Renyi DAGs. Our results show that Pre-Processing Plus PC (P3PC) performs far fewer CI tests than the original PC algorithm, between 0.5% to 36%, and often less than 10%, of the CI tests that the PC algorithm alone performs. The efficiency gains are particularly significant for the DAGs corresponding to real-world systems.
Comments: Accepted at NeurIPS 2022 Workshop on Causality for Real-world Impact; 8 pages of main text including references
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2211.06536 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2211.06536v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.06536
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Erica Cai [view email]
[v1] Sat, 12 Nov 2022 00:54:53 UTC (161 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Improving the Efficiency of the PC Algorithm by Using Model-Based Conditional Independence Tests, by Erica Cai and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-11
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack