Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2211.01809 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Nov 2022 (v1), last revised 18 Apr 2025 (this version, v2)]

Title:Manipulation of individual judgments in the quantitative pairwise comparisons method

Authors:M. Strada, K. Kułakowski
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Decision-making methods very often use the technique of comparing alternatives in pairs. In this approach, experts are asked to compare different options, and then a quantitative ranking is created from the results obtained. It is commonly believed that experts (decision-makers) are honest in their judgments. In our work, we consider a scenario in which experts are vulnerable to bribery. For this purpose, we define a framework that allows us to determine the intended manipulation and present three algorithms for achieving the intended goal. Analyzing these algorithms may provide clues to help defend against such attacks.
Comments: 31 pages, 7 compound figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM)
Cite as: arXiv:2211.01809 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2211.01809v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.01809
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622025500142

Submission history

From: Konrad Kulakowski [view email]
[v1] Tue, 1 Nov 2022 22:35:00 UTC (667 KB)
[v2] Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:43:25 UTC (1,293 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.DM

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)