close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cond-mat > arXiv:2210.16874

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Condensed Matter > Materials Science

arXiv:2210.16874 (cond-mat)
[Submitted on 30 Oct 2022]

Title:Grain growth competition during melt pool solidification -- Comparing phase-field and cellular automaton models

Authors:S.M. Elahi, R. Tavakoli, I. Romero, D. Tourret
View a PDF of the paper titled Grain growth competition during melt pool solidification -- Comparing phase-field and cellular automaton models, by S.M. Elahi and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:A broad range of computational models have been proposed to predict microstructure development during solidification processing but they have seldom been compared to each other on a quantitative and systematic basis. In this paper, we compare phase-field (PF) and cellular automaton (CA) simulations of polycrystalline growth in a two-dimensional melt pool under conditions relevant to additive manufacturing (powder-bed fusion). We compare the resulting grain structures using local (point-by-point) measurements, as well as averaged grain orientation distributions over several simulations. We explore the effect of the CA spatial discretization level and that of the melt pool aspect ratio upon the selected grain texture. Our simulations show that detailed microscopic features related to transient growth conditions and solid-liquid interface stability (e.g. the initial planar growth stage prior to its cellular/dendritic destabilization, or the early elimination of unfavorably oriented grains due to neighbor grain sidebranching) can only be captured by PF simulations. The resulting disagreement between PF and CA predictions can only be addressed partially by a refinement of the CA grid. However, overall grain distributions averaged over the entire melt pools of several simulations seem to lead to a notably better agreement between PF and CA, with some variability with the melt pool shape and CA grid. While further research remains required, in particular to identify the appropriate selection of CA spatial discretization and its link to characteristic microstructural length scales, this research provides a useful step forward in this direction by comparing both methods quantitatively at process-relevant length and time scales.
Subjects: Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
Cite as: arXiv:2210.16874 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
  (or arXiv:2210.16874v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.16874
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Computational Materials Science 216 (2023) 111882
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111882
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Damien Tourret [view email]
[v1] Sun, 30 Oct 2022 16:37:51 UTC (28,345 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Grain growth competition during melt pool solidification -- Comparing phase-field and cellular automaton models, by S.M. Elahi and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-10
Change to browse by:
cond-mat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack