close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2210.06664

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

arXiv:2210.06664 (eess)
[Submitted on 13 Oct 2022]

Title:Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer using AI and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography

Authors:Charis Y.N. Chiang, Fabian Braeu, Thanadet Chuangsuwanich, Royston K.Y. Tan, Jacqueline Chua, Leopold Schmetterer, Alexandre Thiery, Martin Buist, Michaël J.A. Girard
View a PDF of the paper titled Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer using AI and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography, by Charis Y.N. Chiang and 8 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Purpose: (1) To develop a deep learning algorithm to automatically segment structures of the optic nerve head (ONH) and macula in 3D wide-field optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans; (2) To assess whether 3D macula or ONH structures (or the combination of both) provide the best diagnostic power for glaucoma. Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was performed which included wide-field swept-source OCT scans from 319 glaucoma subjects and 298 non-glaucoma subjects. All scans were compensated to improve deep-tissue visibility. We developed a deep learning algorithm to automatically label all major ONH tissue structures by using 270 manually annotated B-scans for training. The performance of our algorithm was assessed using the Dice coefficient (DC). A glaucoma classification algorithm (3D CNN) was then designed using a combination of 500 OCT volumes and their corresponding automatically segmented masks. This algorithm was trained and tested on 3 datasets: OCT scans cropped to contain the macular tissues only, those to contain the ONH tissues only, and the full wide-field OCT scans. The classification performance for each dataset was reported using the AUC. Results: Our segmentation algorithm was able to segment ONH and macular tissues with a DC of 0.94 $\pm$ 0.003. The classification algorithm was best able to diagnose glaucoma using wide-field 3D-OCT volumes with an AUC of 0.99 $\pm$ 0.01, followed by ONH volumes with an AUC of 0.93 $\pm$ 0.06, and finally macular volumes with an AUC of 0.91 $\pm$ 0.11. Conclusions: this study showed that using wide-field OCT as compared to the typical OCT images containing just the ONH or macular may allow for a significantly improved glaucoma diagnosis. This may encourage the mainstream adoption of 3D wide-field OCT scans. For clinical AI studies that use traditional machines, we would recommend the use of ONH scans as opposed to macula scans.
Comments: 23 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2210.06664 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2210.06664v1 [eess.IV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.06664
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Michael Girard [view email]
[v1] Thu, 13 Oct 2022 01:51:29 UTC (5,823 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer using AI and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography, by Charis Y.N. Chiang and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
eess.IV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-10
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.CV
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack