close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:2210.01616

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:2210.01616 (physics)
[Submitted on 4 Oct 2022]

Title:$^{18}$F-PSMA-1007 salivary gland dosimetry: Comparison between different methods for dose calculation and assessment of inter- and intra-patient variability

Authors:Daniele Pistone, Silvano Gnesin, Lucrezia Auditore, Antonio Italiano, Giuseppe Lucio Cascini, Ernesto Amato, Francesco Cicone
View a PDF of the paper titled $^{18}$F-PSMA-1007 salivary gland dosimetry: Comparison between different methods for dose calculation and assessment of inter- and intra-patient variability, by Daniele Pistone and 6 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Dosimetry of salivary glands (SGs) is usually implemented using simplified calculation approaches and approximated geometries. Our aims were to compare different dosimetry methods to calculate SGs absorbed doses (ADs) following 18F-PSMA-1007 injection, and to assess the AD variation across patients and single SG components. Five patients with prostate cancer recurrence underwent PET/CT acquisitions of the head and neck, 0.5, 2 and 4 hours after 18F-PSMA-1007 injection. Parotid and submandibular glands were segmented on CT to derive SGs volumes and masses, while PETs were used to derive Time-Integrated Activity Coefficients. Average ADs to single SG components or total SG (tSG) were calculated with the following methods: i) direct Monte Carlo (MC) simulation with GATE/GEANT4; ii) spherical model (SM) of OLINDA/EXM 2.1, adopting either patient-specific or standard ICRP89 organ masses (SMstd); iii) ellipsoidal model (EM); iv) MIRD approach with organ S-factors from OLINDA/EXM 2.1 and OpenDose collaboration, with or without contribution from cross irradiation originating outside the SGs. The maximum percent AD difference across SG components ({\delta}max) and across patients ({\Delta}max) were calculated. Compared to MC, ADs to single SG components were significantly underestimated by all methods (average relative differences between -14.5% and -30.4%). Using MC, SM and EM, {\delta}max were never below 25% (up to 113%). {\delta}max up to 702% were obtained with SMstd. Concerning tSG, results within 10% of the MC were obtained only if cross irradiation from the remainder of the body or from the remainder of the head was accounted for. The {\Delta}max ranged between 58% and 78% across patients. Specific masses of single SG components should always be considered given their large intra- and inter- patient variability.
Comments: 33 pages, 3 figures, sumbitted to "Physics in Medicine & Biology"
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2210.01616 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:2210.01616v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.01616
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acc633
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Daniele Pistone [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:01:05 UTC (1,273 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled $^{18}$F-PSMA-1007 salivary gland dosimetry: Comparison between different methods for dose calculation and assessment of inter- and intra-patient variability, by Daniele Pistone and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-10
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack