Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2209.06834

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:2209.06834 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 14 Sep 2022 (v1), last revised 8 Feb 2023 (this version, v2)]

Title:Matching the mass function of Milky Way satellites in competing dark matter models

Authors:Mark R. Lovell (1), Jesús Zavala (1) ((1) University of Iceland)
View a PDF of the paper titled Matching the mass function of Milky Way satellites in competing dark matter models, by Mark R. Lovell (1) and Jes\'us Zavala (1) ((1) University of Iceland)
View PDF
Abstract:Any successful model of dark matter must explain the diversity of observed Milky Way (MW) satellite density profiles, from very dense ultrafaints to large, low density satellites such as Crater~II that appear to be larger their anticipated host dark matter haloes. We consider cold dark matter (CDM), warm dark matter (WDM, 3.3keV thermal relic power spectrum), and a self-interacting dark matter model (SIDM) that induces gravothermal collapse in low mass subhaloes. Predictions for these density profiles are complicated by the limitations of simulation resolution in the stripping of subhaloes by the MW system, therefore we make predictions for satellite properties in these three models using $N$-body simulations combined with a semi-analytic halo stripping algorithm. We find that most CDM and WDM subhaloes of mass $>10^{8}$$M_{\odot}$ are large enough after stripping to fit most satellites; however, the required amount of stripping often requires a stronger tidal field than is available on the subhalo's orbit. The lower concentrations of WDM subhaloes enable this model to explain the required satellite masses with less stripping than is necessary for CDM, and is thus consistent with orbits of larger pericentres. SIDM cores offer the best fits to massive, low density satellites at the expense of predicting many $>10^{9}$$M_{\odot}$ subhaloes to host low density satellites with no observed analogue. We conclude that an SIDM model must have a very high velocity-dependent cross-section in order to match all satellites, and that WDM offers a marginally better fit than CDM to the MW satellite mass function.
Comments: 23 pages, 14 figures, accepted by MNRAS. Contact: [email protected]
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2209.06834 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2209.06834v2 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.06834
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad216
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Mark Lovell [view email]
[v1] Wed, 14 Sep 2022 18:00:02 UTC (1,037 KB)
[v2] Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:38:52 UTC (1,055 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Matching the mass function of Milky Way satellites in competing dark matter models, by Mark R. Lovell (1) and Jes\'us Zavala (1) ((1) University of Iceland)
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA
hep-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack