Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2209.06783

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2209.06783 (stat)
[Submitted on 14 Sep 2022 (v1), last revised 22 Sep 2022 (this version, v2)]

Title:Sources of residual autocorrelation in multiband task fMRI and strategies for effective mitigation

Authors:Fatma Parlak, Damon D. Pham, Daniel A. Spencer, Robert C. Welsh, Amanda F. Mejia
View a PDF of the paper titled Sources of residual autocorrelation in multiband task fMRI and strategies for effective mitigation, by Fatma Parlak and Damon D. Pham and Daniel A. Spencer and Robert C. Welsh and Amanda F. Mejia
View PDF
Abstract:In task fMRI analysis, OLS is typically used to estimate task-induced activation in the brain. Since task fMRI residuals often exhibit temporal autocorrelation, it is common practice to perform prewhitening prior to OLS to satisfy the assumption of residual independence, equivalent to GLS. While theoretically straightforward, a major challenge in prewhitening in fMRI is accurately estimating the residual autocorrelation at each location of the brain. Assuming a global autocorrelation model, as in several fMRI software programs, may under- or over-whiten particular regions and fail to achieve nominal false positive control across the brain. Faster multiband acquisitions require more sophisticated models to capture autocorrelation, making prewhitening more difficult. These issues are becoming more critical now because of a trend towards subject-level analysis, where prewhitening has a greater impact than in group-average analyses. In this article, we first thoroughly examine the sources of residual autocorrelation in multiband task fMRI. We find that residual autocorrelation varies spatially throughout the cortex and is affected by the task, the acquisition method, modeling choices, and individual differences. Second, we evaluate the ability of different AR-based prewhitening strategies to effectively mitigate autocorrelation and control false positives. We find that allowing the prewhitening filter to vary spatially is the most important factor for successful prewhitening, even more so than increasing AR model order. To overcome the computational challenge associated with spatially variable prewhitening, we developed a computationally efficient R implementation based on parallelization and fast C++ backend code. This implementation is included in the open source R package BayesfMRI.
Comments: 26 pages with 1 page of appendix, 11 figures with 1 figure of supplementary figure
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2209.06783 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2209.06783v2 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.06783
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1051424
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Fatma Parlak [view email]
[v1] Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:04:37 UTC (44,557 KB)
[v2] Thu, 22 Sep 2022 20:51:10 UTC (43,635 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Sources of residual autocorrelation in multiband task fMRI and strategies for effective mitigation, by Fatma Parlak and Damon D. Pham and Daniel A. Spencer and Robert C. Welsh and Amanda F. Mejia
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-09
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack