Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2209.03799

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

arXiv:2209.03799 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 8 Sep 2022]

Title:Can the Production Cross-Section Uncertainties Explain the Cosmic Fluorine Anomaly?

Authors:Meng-Jie Zhao, Xiao-Jun Bi, Kun Fang
View a PDF of the paper titled Can the Production Cross-Section Uncertainties Explain the Cosmic Fluorine Anomaly?, by Meng-Jie Zhao and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The stable secondary-to-primary flux ratios of cosmic rays (CRs), represented by the boron-to-carbon ratio (B/C), are the main probes of the Galactic CR propagation. However, the fluorine-to-silicon ratio (F/Si) predicted by the CR diffusion coefficient inferred from B/C is significantly higher than the latest measurement of AMS-02. This anomaly is commonly attributed to the uncertainties of the F production cross sections. In this work, we give a careful test to this interpretation. We consider four different cross-section parametric models. Each model is constrained by the latest cross-section data. We perform combined fits to the B/C, F/Si, and cross-section data with the same propagation framework. Two of the cross-section models have good overall goodness of fit with $\chi^2/n_{d.o.f.}\sim1$. However, the goodness of fit of the cross-section part is poor with $\chi^2_{\rm{cs}}/n_{\rm{cs}}\gtrsim2$ for these models. The best-fitted F production cross sections are systematically larger than the measurements, while the fitted cross sections for B production are systematically lower than the measurements. This indicates that the F anomaly can hardly be interpreted by neither the random errors of the cross-section measurements nor the differences between the existing cross-section models. We then propose that the spatially dependent diffusion model could help to explain B/C and F/Si consistently. In this model, the average diffusion coefficient of the Ne-Si group is expected to be larger than that of the C-O group.
Comments: 13 pages, 7 figures
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2209.03799 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:2209.03799v1 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.03799
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.063020
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Mengjie Zhao [view email]
[v1] Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:16:24 UTC (859 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Can the Production Cross-Section Uncertainties Explain the Cosmic Fluorine Anomaly?, by Meng-Jie Zhao and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.HE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
hep-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack