Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory

arXiv:2208.06521 (cs)
[Submitted on 12 Aug 2022 (v1), last revised 1 Mar 2023 (this version, v2)]

Title:Non-strategic Econometrics (for Initial Play)

Authors:Daniel Chui, Jason Hartline, James R. Wright
View PDF
Abstract:Modelling agent preferences has applications in a range of fields including economics and increasingly, artificial intelligence. These preferences are not always known and thus may need to be estimated from observed behavior, in which case a model is required to map agent preferences to behavior, also known as structural estimation. Traditional models are based on the assumption that agents are perfectly rational: that is, they perfectly optimize and behave in accordance with their own interests. Work in the field of behavioral game theory has shown, however, that human agents often make decisions that are imperfectly rational, and the field has developed models that relax the perfect rationality assumption. We apply models developed for predicting behavior towards estimating preferences and show that they outperform both traditional and commonly used benchmark models on data collected from human subjects. In fact, Nash equilibrium and its relaxation, quantal response equilibrium (QRE), can induce an inaccurate estimate of agent preferences when compared against ground truth.
A key finding is that modelling non-strategic behavior, conventionally considered uniform noise, is important for estimating preferences. To this end, we introduce quantal-linear4, a rich non-strategic model. We also propose an augmentation to the popular quantal response equilibrium with a non-strategic component. We call this augmented model QRE+L0 and find an improvement in estimating values over the standard QRE.
QRE+L0 allows for alternative models of non-strategic behavior in addition to quantal-linear4.
Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
Cite as: arXiv:2208.06521 [cs.GT]
  (or arXiv:2208.06521v2 [cs.GT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.06521

Submission history

From: Daniel Chui [view email]
[v1] Fri, 12 Aug 2022 22:37:10 UTC (2,221 KB)
[v2] Wed, 1 Mar 2023 03:55:23 UTC (2,312 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

view license
Current browse context:
cs.GT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-08
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)