Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2207.11534

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Image and Video Processing

arXiv:2207.11534 (eess)
[Submitted on 23 Jul 2022]

Title:Comparative Validation of AI and non-AI Methods in MRI Volumetry to Diagnose Parkinsonian Syndromes

Authors:Joomee Song, Juyoung Hahm, Jisoo Lee, Chae Yeon Lim, Myung Jin Chung, Jinyoung Youn, Jin Whan Cho, Jong Hyeon Ahn, Kyung-Su Kim
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparative Validation of AI and non-AI Methods in MRI Volumetry to Diagnose Parkinsonian Syndromes, by Joomee Song and 8 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Automated segmentation and volumetry of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are essential for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Parkinson's plus syndromes (P-plus). To enhance the diagnostic performance, we adopt deep learning (DL) models in brain segmentation and compared their performance with the gold-standard non-DL method. We collected brain MRI scans of healthy controls (n=105) and patients with PD (n=105), multiple systemic atrophy (n=132), and progressive supranuclear palsy (n=69) at Samsung Medical Center from January 2017 to December 2020. Using the gold-standard non-DL model, FreeSurfer (FS), we segmented six brain structures: midbrain, pons, caudate, putamen, pallidum, and third ventricle, and considered them as annotating data for DL models, the representative V-Net and UNETR. The Dice scores and area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating normal, PD, and P-plus cases were calculated. The segmentation times of V-Net and UNETR for the six brain structures per patient were 3.48 +- 0.17 and 48.14 +- 0.97 s, respectively, being at least 300 times faster than FS (15,735 +- 1.07 s). Dice scores of both DL models were sufficiently high (>0.85), and their AUCs for disease classification were superior to that of FS. For classification of normal vs. P-plus and PD vs. multiple systemic atrophy (cerebellar type), the DL models and FS showed AUCs above 0.8. DL significantly reduces the analysis time without compromising the performance of brain segmentation and differential diagnosis. Our findings may contribute to the adoption of DL brain MRI segmentation in clinical settings and advance brain research.
Comments: Joomee Song and Juyoung Hahm contributed equally to this work as the co-first author. Jong Hyeon Ahn and Kyung-Su Kim (this http URL@gmail.com) contributed equally to this work as the co-corresponding author
Subjects: Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2207.11534 [eess.IV]
  (or arXiv:2207.11534v1 [eess.IV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.11534
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kyung-Su Kim [view email]
[v1] Sat, 23 Jul 2022 14:55:38 UTC (7,301 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparative Validation of AI and non-AI Methods in MRI Volumetry to Diagnose Parkinsonian Syndromes, by Joomee Song and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
eess.IV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-07
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.CV
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack