Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > quant-ph > arXiv:2207.09251

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantum Physics

arXiv:2207.09251 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 19 Jul 2022 (v1), last revised 30 Sep 2022 (this version, v2)]

Title:Quantum vs classical genetic algorithms: A numerical comparison shows faster convergence

Authors:Rubén Ibarrondo, Giancarlo Gatti, Mikel Sanz
View a PDF of the paper titled Quantum vs classical genetic algorithms: A numerical comparison shows faster convergence, by Rub\'en Ibarrondo and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Genetic algorithms are heuristic optimization techniques inspired by Darwinian evolution. Quantum computation is a new computational paradigm which exploits quantum resources to speed up information processing tasks. Therefore, it is sensible to explore the potential enhancement in the performance of genetic algorithms by introducing quantum degrees of freedom. Along this line, a modular quantum genetic algorithm has recently been proposed, with individuals encoded in independent registers comprising exchangeable quantum subroutines [arXiv:2203.15039], which leads to different variants. Here, we address the numerical benchmarking of these algorithms against classical genetic algorithms, a comparison missing from previous literature. To overcome the severe limitations of simulating quantum algorithms, our approach focuses on measuring the effect of quantum resources on the performance. In order to isolate the effect of the quantum resources in the performance, the classical variants have been selected to resemble the fundamental characteristics of the quantum genetic algorithms. Under these conditions, we encode an optimization problem in a two-qubit Hamiltonian and face the problem of finding its ground state. A numerical analysis based on a sample of 200 random cases shows that some quantum variants outperform all classical ones in convergence speed towards a near-to-optimal result. Additionally, we have considered a diagonal Hamiltonian and the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen molecule to complete the analysis with two relevant use-cases. If this advantage holds for larger systems, quantum genetic algorithms would provide a new tool to address optimization problems with quantum computers.
Comments: 7 pages, 4 figures, submitted to the IEEE Symposium Series On Computational Intelligence 2022
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2207.09251 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:2207.09251v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.09251
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: 2022 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Singapore, 947-954 (2022)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI51031.2022.10022159
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Rubén Ibarrondo [view email]
[v1] Tue, 19 Jul 2022 13:07:44 UTC (1,116 KB)
[v2] Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:56:27 UTC (1,116 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Quantum vs classical genetic algorithms: A numerical comparison shows faster convergence, by Rub\'en Ibarrondo and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-07

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack