Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2207.03597 (stat)
[Submitted on 7 Jul 2022 (v1), last revised 24 Jan 2023 (this version, v2)]

Title:Nonparametric Estimation of the Potential Impact Fraction and Population Attributable Fraction with Individual-Level and Aggregated Data

Authors:Colleen E. Chan, Rodrigo Zepeda-Tello, Dalia Camacho-García-Formentí, Frederick Cudhea, Rafael Meza, Eliane Rodrigues, Donna Spiegelman, Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez, Xin Zhou
View PDF
Abstract:The estimation of the potential impact fraction (including the population attributable fraction) with continuous exposure data frequently relies on strong distributional assumptions. However, these assumptions are often violated if the underlying exposure distribution is unknown or if the same distribution is assumed across time or space. Nonparametric methods to estimate the potential impact fraction are available for cohort data, but no alternatives exist for cross-sectional data. In this article, we discuss the impact of distributional assumptions in the estimation of the population impact fraction, showing that under an infinite set of possibilities, distributional violations lead to biased estimates. We propose nonparametric methods to estimate the potential impact fraction for aggregated (mean and standard deviation) or individual data (e.g. observations from a cross-sectional population survey), and develop simulation scenarios to compare their performance against standard parametric procedures. We illustrate our methodology on an application of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on incidence of type 2 diabetes. We also present an R package pifpaf to implement these methods.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2207.03597 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2207.03597v2 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.03597

Submission history

From: Colleen Chan [view email]
[v1] Thu, 7 Jul 2022 21:56:28 UTC (85 KB)
[v2] Tue, 24 Jan 2023 21:42:18 UTC (83 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-07
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)