Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:2206.13168 (stat)
[Submitted on 27 Jun 2022]

Title:Multilevel Quality Indicators (MQI): Methodology and Monte Carlo evidence

Authors:Martin Roessler, Claudia Schulte, Uwe Repschläger, Dagmar Hertle, Danny Wende
View PDF
Abstract:Background: Quality indicators are frequently used to assess the performance of healthcare providers, in particular hospitals. Established approaches to the design of such indicators are subject to distortions due to indirect standardization and high variance of estimators. Indicators for geographical regions are rarely considered.
Objectives: To develop and evaluate a methodology of Multilevel Quality Indicators (MQI) for both healthcare providers and geographical regions.
Research Design: We formally derived MQI from a statistical multilevel model, which may include characteristics of patients, providers, and regions. We used Monte Carlo simulation to assess the performance of MQI relative to established approaches based on the standardized mortality/morbidity ratio (SMR) and the risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR).
Measures: Rank correlation between true provider/region effects and quality indicator estimates; shares of the 10% best and 10% worst providers identified by the quality indicators.
Results: The proposed MQI are 1) standardized hospital outcome rate (SHOR), 2) regional SHOR (RSHOR), and 3) regional standardized patient outcome rate (RSPOR). Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the SHOR provides substantially better estimates of provider performance than the SMR and RSMR in almost all scenarios. RSPOR was slightly more stable than the regional SMR. We also found that modeling of regional characteristics generally improves the adequacy of provider-level estimates.
Conclusions: MQI methodology facilitates adequate and efficient estimation of quality indicators for both healthcare providers and geographical regions.
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:2206.13168 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:2206.13168v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.13168

Submission history

From: Martin Roessler [view email]
[v1] Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:20:14 UTC (58 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-06
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)