Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2205.09344

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:2205.09344 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 19 May 2022]

Title:Unsupervised classification of CIGALE galaxy spectra

Authors:J Dubois (IPAG), D Fraix-Burnet (IPAG), J Moultaka (IRAP), P Sharma (LAM), D Burgarella (LAM)
View a PDF of the paper titled Unsupervised classification of CIGALE galaxy spectra, by J Dubois (IPAG) and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Aims. The present study aims at providing a deeper insight into the power and limitation of an unsupervised classification algorithm (called Fisher-EM) on spectra of galaxies. This algorithm uses a Gaussian mixture in a discriminative latent subspace. To this end, we investigate the capacity of this algorithm to segregate the physical parameters used to generate mock spectra and the influence of the noise on the classification. Methods. With the code CIGALE and different values for nine input parameters characterising the stellar population, we have simulated a sample of 11 475 optical spectra of galaxies containing 496 monochromatic fluxes. The statistical model and the optimum number of clusters is given in Fisher-EM by the integrated completed likelihood (ICL) criterion. We repeated the analyses several times to assess the robustness of the results. Results. Two distinct classifications can be distinguished in the case of the noiseless spectra. The one above 13 clusters disappears when noise is added, while the classification with 12 clusters is very robust against noise down to a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 3. At SNR=1, the optimum is 5 clusters, but the classification is still compatible with the previous one. The distribution of the parameters used for the simulation shows an excellent discrimination between classes. A higher dispersion both in the spectra within each class and in the parameter distribution, leads us to conclude that despite a much higher ICL, the classification with more than 13 clusters in the noiseless case is not physically relevant. Conclusions. This study yields two conclusions valid at least for the Fisher-EM algorithm. Firstly, the unsupervised classification of spectra of galaxies is both reliable and robust to noise. Secondly, such analyses are able to extract the useful physical information contained in the spectra and to build highly meaningful classifications. In an epoch of data-driven astrophysics, it is important to trust unsupervised machine learning approaches that do not require training samples which are unavoidably biased.
Comments: Astronomy and Astrophysics - A&A, EDP Sciences, In press
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
Cite as: arXiv:2205.09344 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:2205.09344v1 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.09344
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 663, A21 (2022)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141729
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Didier Fraix-Burnet [view email] [via CCSD proxy]
[v1] Thu, 19 May 2022 06:44:48 UTC (3,182 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Unsupervised classification of CIGALE galaxy spectra, by J Dubois (IPAG) and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-05
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.CO
astro-ph.IM

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack