Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies
[Submitted on 19 May 2022]
Title:Unsupervised classification of CIGALE galaxy spectra
View PDFAbstract:Aims. The present study aims at providing a deeper insight into the power and limitation of an unsupervised classification algorithm (called Fisher-EM) on spectra of galaxies. This algorithm uses a Gaussian mixture in a discriminative latent subspace. To this end, we investigate the capacity of this algorithm to segregate the physical parameters used to generate mock spectra and the influence of the noise on the classification. Methods. With the code CIGALE and different values for nine input parameters characterising the stellar population, we have simulated a sample of 11 475 optical spectra of galaxies containing 496 monochromatic fluxes. The statistical model and the optimum number of clusters is given in Fisher-EM by the integrated completed likelihood (ICL) criterion. We repeated the analyses several times to assess the robustness of the results. Results. Two distinct classifications can be distinguished in the case of the noiseless spectra. The one above 13 clusters disappears when noise is added, while the classification with 12 clusters is very robust against noise down to a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 3. At SNR=1, the optimum is 5 clusters, but the classification is still compatible with the previous one. The distribution of the parameters used for the simulation shows an excellent discrimination between classes. A higher dispersion both in the spectra within each class and in the parameter distribution, leads us to conclude that despite a much higher ICL, the classification with more than 13 clusters in the noiseless case is not physically relevant. Conclusions. This study yields two conclusions valid at least for the Fisher-EM algorithm. Firstly, the unsupervised classification of spectra of galaxies is both reliable and robust to noise. Secondly, such analyses are able to extract the useful physical information contained in the spectra and to build highly meaningful classifications. In an epoch of data-driven astrophysics, it is important to trust unsupervised machine learning approaches that do not require training samples which are unavoidably biased.
Submission history
From: Didier Fraix-Burnet [view email] [via CCSD proxy][v1] Thu, 19 May 2022 06:44:48 UTC (3,182 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.