Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:2204.12446

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Machine Learning

arXiv:2204.12446 (stat)
[Submitted on 26 Apr 2022 (v1), last revised 9 Feb 2023 (this version, v5)]

Title:Beyond Lipschitz: Sharp Generalization and Excess Risk Bounds for Full-Batch GD

Authors:Konstantinos E. Nikolakakis, Farzin Haddadpour, Amin Karbasi, Dionysios S. Kalogerias
View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Lipschitz: Sharp Generalization and Excess Risk Bounds for Full-Batch GD, by Konstantinos E. Nikolakakis and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We provide sharp path-dependent generalization and excess risk guarantees for the full-batch Gradient Descent (GD) algorithm on smooth losses (possibly non-Lipschitz, possibly nonconvex). At the heart of our analysis is an upper bound on the generalization error, which implies that average output stability and a bounded expected optimization error at termination lead to generalization. This result shows that a small generalization error occurs along the optimization path, and allows us to bypass Lipschitz or sub-Gaussian assumptions on the loss prevalent in previous works. For nonconvex, convex, and strongly convex losses, we show the explicit dependence of the generalization error in terms of the accumulated path-dependent optimization error, terminal optimization error, number of samples, and number of iterations. For nonconvex smooth losses, we prove that full-batch GD efficiently generalizes close to any stationary point at termination, and recovers the generalization error guarantees of stochastic algorithms with fewer assumptions. For smooth convex losses, we show that the generalization error is tighter than existing bounds for SGD (up to one order of error magnitude). Consequently the excess risk matches that of SGD for quadratically less iterations. Lastly, for strongly convex smooth losses, we show that full-batch GD achieves essentially the same excess risk rate as compared with the state of the art on SGD, but with an exponentially smaller number of iterations (logarithmic in the dataset size).
Comments: 35 pages
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2204.12446 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:2204.12446v5 [stat.ML] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.12446
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Konstantinos Nikolakakis [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:05:57 UTC (41 KB)
[v2] Sun, 8 May 2022 22:21:02 UTC (45 KB)
[v3] Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:56:32 UTC (52 KB)
[v4] Mon, 10 Oct 2022 19:35:00 UTC (63 KB)
[v5] Thu, 9 Feb 2023 22:05:06 UTC (63 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Lipschitz: Sharp Generalization and Excess Risk Bounds for Full-Batch GD, by Konstantinos E. Nikolakakis and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
stat.ML
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-04
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack