Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > gr-qc > arXiv:2203.13937

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

arXiv:2203.13937 (gr-qc)
[Submitted on 25 Mar 2022]

Title:Tests of General Relativity with Gravitational-Wave Observations using a Flexible--Theory-Independent Method

Authors:Ajit Kumar Mehta, Alessandra Buonanno, Roberto Cotesta, Abhirup Ghosh, Noah Sennett, Jan Steinhoff
View a PDF of the paper titled Tests of General Relativity with Gravitational-Wave Observations using a Flexible--Theory-Independent Method, by Ajit Kumar Mehta and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We perform tests of General Relativity (GR) with gravitational waves (GWs) from the inspiral stage of compact binaries using a theory-independent framework, which adds generic phase corrections to each multipole of a GR waveform model in frequency domain. This method has been demonstrated on LIGO-Virgo observations to provide stringent constraints on post-Newtonian predictions of the inspiral and to assess systematic biases that may arise in such parameterized tests. Here, we detail the anatomy of our framework for aligned-spin waveform models. We explore the effects of higher modes in the underlying signal on tests of GR through analyses of two unequal-mass, simulated binary signals similar to GW190412 and GW190814. We show that the inclusion of higher modes improves both the precision and the accuracy of the measurement of the deviation parameters. Our testing framework also allows us to vary the underlying baseline GR waveform model and the frequency at which the non-GR inspiral corrections are tapered off. We find that to optimize the GR test of high-mass binaries, comprehensive studies would need to be done to determine the best choice of the tapering frequency as a function of the binary's properties. We also carry out an analysis on the binary neutron-star event GW170817 to set bounds on the coupling constant $\alpha_0$ of Jordan-Fierz-Brans-Dicke gravity. We take two plausible approaches; in the first \emph{theory-agnostic} approach we find a bound $\alpha_0 \lesssim 2\times 10^{-1}$ from measuring the dipole-radiation for different neutron-star equations of state, while in the second \emph{theory-specific} approach we obtain $\alpha_0 \lesssim 4\times 10^{-1}$, both at $68\%$ credible level. These differences arise mainly due to different statistical hypotheses used for the analysis.
Comments: 24 pages, 13 figures
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Report number: LIGO-P2200083-v2
Cite as: arXiv:2203.13937 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:2203.13937v1 [gr-qc] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.13937
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 107, 044020 (2023)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.044020
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Ajit Mehta [view email]
[v1] Fri, 25 Mar 2022 23:37:32 UTC (8,147 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Tests of General Relativity with Gravitational-Wave Observations using a Flexible--Theory-Independent Method, by Ajit Kumar Mehta and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
gr-qc
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-03

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack