Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2203.11141

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2203.11141 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Mar 2022 (v1), last revised 7 Dec 2022 (this version, v2)]

Title:Can we integrate spatial verification methods into neural-network loss functions for atmospheric science?

Authors:Ryan Lagerquist, Imme Ebert-Uphoff
View a PDF of the paper titled Can we integrate spatial verification methods into neural-network loss functions for atmospheric science?, by Ryan Lagerquist and Imme Ebert-Uphoff
View PDF
Abstract:In the last decade, much work in atmospheric science has focused on spatial verification (SV) methods for gridded prediction, which overcome serious disadvantages of pixelwise verification. However, neural networks (NN) in atmospheric science are almost always trained to optimize pixelwise loss functions, even when ultimately assessed with SV methods. This establishes a disconnect between model verification during vs. after training. To address this issue, we develop spatially enhanced loss functions (SELF) and demonstrate their use for a real-world problem: predicting the occurrence of thunderstorms (henceforth, "convection") with NNs. In each SELF we use either a neighbourhood filter, which highlights convection at scales larger than a threshold, or a spectral filter (employing Fourier or wavelet decomposition), which is more flexible and highlights convection at scales between two thresholds. We use these filters to spatially enhance common verification scores, such as the Brier score. We train each NN with a different SELF and compare their performance at many scales of convection, from discrete storm cells to tropical cyclones. Among our many findings are that (a) for a low (high) risk threshold, the ideal SELF focuses on small (large) scales; (b) models trained with a pixelwise loss function perform surprisingly well; (c) however, models trained with a spectral filter produce much better-calibrated probabilities than a pixelwise model. We provide a general guide to using SELFs, including technical challenges and the final Python code, as well as demonstrating their use for the convection problem. To our knowledge this is the most in-depth guide to SELFs in the geosciences.
Comments: 51 pages + 21 pages of supplemental material, 15 figures, 3 tables, 7 supplemental figures, accepted to Artificial Intelligence for Earth Systems
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (physics.ao-ph); Applications (stat.AP); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2203.11141 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2203.11141v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.11141
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems (2022), 1 (4), pg. e220021
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/AIES-D-22-0021.1
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Ryan Lagerquist [view email]
[v1] Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:18:43 UTC (46,069 KB)
[v2] Wed, 7 Dec 2022 00:49:40 UTC (48,788 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Can we integrate spatial verification methods into neural-network loss functions for atmospheric science?, by Ryan Lagerquist and Imme Ebert-Uphoff
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
physics
physics.ao-ph
stat
stat.AP
stat.ME

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack