Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2203.09396

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:2203.09396 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 17 Mar 2022 (v1), last revised 14 Jun 2023 (this version, v3)]

Title:Cosmological structure formation in complex scalar field dark matter versus real ultralight axions: a comparative study using CLASS

Authors:Horst Foidl, Tanja Rindler-Daller
View a PDF of the paper titled Cosmological structure formation in complex scalar field dark matter versus real ultralight axions: a comparative study using CLASS, by Horst Foidl and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:(abridged) We continue the study of $\Lambda$SFDM cosmologies, which differ from $\Lambda$CDM in that CDM is replaced by scalar field dark matter (SFDM) by calculating the evolution of the background Universe, as well as linear perturbations, focusing on scalar modes. We consider models with complex scalar field with a repulsive, quartic self-interaction (SI), and models without SI, referred to as fuzzy dark matter (FDM). To this end, we modify the Boltzmann code CLASS, to incorporate the physics of complex SFDM which has as one of its characteristics that its equation of state is maximally stiff in the very early Universe, dominating then over all the other cosmic components, even over radiation. We calculate CMB and matter power spectra as well as unconditional Press-Schechter halo mass functions for various models, expanding previous literature that were limited either to the background, or to a semi-analytical approach to SFDM density perturbations neglecting the early stiff phase. Comparing our results of each, SFDM and FDM, with real-field ultralight axion models (ULAs) without SI, we characterize the differences between the respective background evolution and linear structure growth. Our calculations confirm previous results of recent literature, implying that SFDM models with $\gtrsim$ kpc-size halo cores are disfavored, questioning their ability to explain the small-scale problems on dwarf-galactic scales. Also we find that the kinetic energy due to the phase of the complex field leads to marked differences between SFDM/FDM versus ULAs. The mild falloff in the SFDM power spectrum toward high k is similar to that of CDM but based on different effects, namely the rapidly shrinking Jeans mass for SFDM as opposed to the Meszaros effect for CDM. In addition, we find that the sharp cutoff in the ULA power spectrum is also followed by a mild falloff, albeit at very small power.
Comments: final, proof-read version
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2203.09396 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2203.09396v3 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.09396
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123534
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Horst Foidl [view email]
[v1] Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:45:22 UTC (1,939 KB)
[v2] Sat, 28 May 2022 12:19:17 UTC (1,748 KB)
[v3] Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:23:24 UTC (1,748 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Cosmological structure formation in complex scalar field dark matter versus real ultralight axions: a comparative study using CLASS, by Horst Foidl and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA
hep-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack