Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2203.08125

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:2203.08125 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 15 Mar 2022 (v1), last revised 14 Sep 2022 (this version, v2)]

Title:A machine-learning photometric classifier for massive stars in nearby galaxies I. The method

Authors:Grigoris Maravelias, Alceste Z. Bonanos, Frank Tramper, Stephan de Wit, Ming Yang, Paolo Bonfini
View a PDF of the paper titled A machine-learning photometric classifier for massive stars in nearby galaxies I. The method, by Grigoris Maravelias and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:(abridged) Mass loss is a key parameter in the evolution of massive stars, with discrepancies between theory and observations and with unknown importance of the episodic mass loss. To address this we need increased numbers of classified sources stars spanning a range of metallicity environments. We aim to remedy the situation by applying machine learning techniques to recently available extensive photometric catalogs. We used IR/Spitzer and optical/Pan-STARRS, with Gaia astrometric information, to compile a large catalog of known massive stars in M31 and M33, which were grouped in Blue, Red, Yellow, B[e] supergiants, Luminous Blue Variables, Wolf-Rayet, and background galaxies. Due to the high imbalance, we implemented synthetic data generation to populate the underrepresented classes and improve separation by undersampling the majority class. We built an ensemble classifier using color indices. The probabilities from Support Vector Classification, Random Forests, and Multi-layer Perceptron were combined for the final classification. The overall weighted balanced accuracy is ~83%, recovering Red supergiants at ~94%, Blue/Yellow/B[e] supergiants and background galaxies at ~50-80%, Wolf-Rayets at ~45%, and Luminous Blue Variables at ~30%, mainly due to their small sample sizes. The mixing of spectral types (no strict boundaries in their color indices) complicates the classification. Independent application to IC 1613, WLM, and Sextans A galaxies resulted in an overall lower accuracy of ~70%, attributed to metallicity and extinction effects. The missing data imputation was explored using simple replacement with mean values and an iterative imputor, which proved more capable. We also found that r-i and y-[3.6] were the most important features. Our method, although limited by the sampling of the feature space, is efficient in classifying sources with missing data and at lower metallicitites.
Comments: 27 pages, 18 figures, 6 tables; accepted for publication in A&A; typos and minor editing corrections
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
Cite as: arXiv:2203.08125 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:2203.08125v2 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.08125
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 666, A122 (2022)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141397
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Grigoris Maravelias [view email]
[v1] Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:53:00 UTC (1,977 KB)
[v2] Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:57:54 UTC (4,030 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A machine-learning photometric classifier for massive stars in nearby galaxies I. The method, by Grigoris Maravelias and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA
astro-ph.IM

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack