Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:2201.12526

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:2201.12526 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 29 Jan 2022]

Title:On Dark Gravitational Wave Standard Sirens as Cosmological Inference and Forecasting the Constraint on Hubble Constant using Binary Black Holes Detected by Deci-hertz Observatory

Authors:Ju Chen, Changshuo Yan, Youjun Lu, Yuetong Zhao, Junqiang Ge
View a PDF of the paper titled On Dark Gravitational Wave Standard Sirens as Cosmological Inference and Forecasting the Constraint on Hubble Constant using Binary Black Holes Detected by Deci-hertz Observatory, by Ju Chen and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Gravitational wave (GW) signals from compact binary coalescences can be used as standard sirens to constrain cosmological parameters if their redshift can be measured independently. However, mergers of stellar binary black holes (BBHs) may not have electromagnetic counterparts and thus have no direct redshift measurements. These dark sirens may be still used to statistically constrain cosmological parameters by combining their GW measured luminosity distances and localization with deep redshift surveys of galaxies around it. We investigate this dark siren method in detail by using mock BBH and galaxy samples. We find that the Hubble constant can be constrained well with an accuracy $\lesssim1\%$ with a few tens or more of BBH mergers at redshift up to $1$ if GW observations can provide accurate estimates of their luminosity distance (with relative error of $\lesssim0.01$) and localization ($\lesssim0.1~\rm{deg}^2$), though the constraint may be significantly biased if the luminosity distance and localization errors are larger. We also introduce a simple method to correct this bias and find it is valid when the luminosity distance and localization errors are modestly large. We further generate mock BBH samples, according to current constraints on BBH merger rate and the distributions of BBH properties, and find that the Deci-hertz Observatory (DO) in a half year observation period may detect about one hundred BBHs with signal-to-noise ratio $\varrho\gtrsim30$, relative luminosity distance error $\lesssim0.02$, and localization error $\lesssim0.01\rm{deg}^2$. By applying the dark standard siren method, we find that the Hubble constant can be constrained to the $\sim0.1-1\%$ level using these DO BBHs, an accuracy comparable to the constraints obtained by using electromagnetic observations in the near future, thus it may provide insight into the Hubble tension.
Comments: 15 pages, 9 figures
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:2201.12526 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2201.12526v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.12526
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22:015020,2022
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac3992
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Changshuo Yan [view email]
[v1] Sat, 29 Jan 2022 08:39:50 UTC (2,253 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled On Dark Gravitational Wave Standard Sirens as Cosmological Inference and Forecasting the Constraint on Hubble Constant using Binary Black Holes Detected by Deci-hertz Observatory, by Ju Chen and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.HE

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack