close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > eess > arXiv:2201.06685

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Audio and Speech Processing

arXiv:2201.06685 (eess)
[Submitted on 18 Jan 2022 (v1), last revised 30 Mar 2022 (this version, v2)]

Title:How Bad Are Artifacts?: Analyzing the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on ASR

Authors:Kazuma Iwamoto, Tsubasa Ochiai, Marc Delcroix, Rintaro Ikeshita, Hiroshi Sato, Shoko Araki, Shigeru Katagiri
View a PDF of the paper titled How Bad Are Artifacts?: Analyzing the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on ASR, by Kazuma Iwamoto and 6 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:It is challenging to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance in noisy conditions with single-channel speech enhancement (SE). In this paper, we investigate the causes of ASR performance degradation by decomposing the SE errors using orthogonal projection-based decomposition (OPD). OPD decomposes the SE errors into noise and artifact components. The artifact component is defined as the SE error signal that cannot be represented as a linear combination of speech and noise sources. We propose manually scaling the error components to analyze their impact on ASR. We experimentally identify the artifact component as the main cause of performance degradation, and we find that mitigating the artifact can greatly improve ASR performance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the simple observation adding (OA) technique (i.e., adding a scaled version of the observed signal to the enhanced speech) can monotonically increase the signal-to-artifact ratio under a mild condition. Accordingly, we experimentally confirm that OA improves ASR performance for both simulated and real recordings. The findings of this paper provide a better understanding of the influence of SE errors on ASR and open the door to future research on novel approaches for designing effective single-channel SE front-ends for ASR.
Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures, submitted to Interspeech 2022
Subjects: Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Sound (cs.SD)
Cite as: arXiv:2201.06685 [eess.AS]
  (or arXiv:2201.06685v2 [eess.AS] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.06685
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Tsubasa Ochiai [view email]
[v1] Tue, 18 Jan 2022 01:12:01 UTC (635 KB)
[v2] Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:18:52 UTC (502 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled How Bad Are Artifacts?: Analyzing the Impact of Speech Enhancement Errors on ASR, by Kazuma Iwamoto and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
eess.AS
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SD
eess

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack