Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2201.05648

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Information Retrieval

arXiv:2201.05648 (cs)
[Submitted on 14 Jan 2022]

Title:Towards Reducing Manual Workload in Technology-Assisted Reviews: Estimating Ranking Performance

Authors:Grace E. Lee, Aixin Sun
View a PDF of the paper titled Towards Reducing Manual Workload in Technology-Assisted Reviews: Estimating Ranking Performance, by Grace E. Lee and Aixin Sun
View PDF
Abstract:Conducting a systematic review (SR) is comprised of multiple tasks: (i) collect documents (studies) that are likely to be relevant from digital libraries (eg., PubMed), (ii) manually read and label the documents as relevant or irrelevant, (iii) extract information from the relevant studies, and (iv) analyze and synthesize the information and derive a conclusion of SR. When researchers label studies, they can screen ranked documents where relevant documents are higher than irrelevant ones. This practice, known as screening prioritization (ie., document ranking approach), speeds up the process of conducting a SR as the documents labelled as relevant can move to the next tasks earlier. However, the approach is limited in reducing the manual workload because the total number of documents to screen remains the same. Towards reducing the manual workload in the screening process, we investigate the quality of document ranking of SR. This can signal researchers whereabouts in the ranking relevant studies are located and let them decide where to stop the screening. After extensive analysis on SR document rankings from different ranking models, we hypothesize 'topic broadness' as a factor that affects the ranking quality of SR. Finally, we propose a measure that estimates the topic broadness and demonstrate that the proposed measure is a simple yet effective method to predict the qualities of document rankings for SRs.
Comments: 9 pages, work done in 2019, revised in 2021
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2201.05648 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:2201.05648v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.05648
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Grace Lee [view email]
[v1] Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:48:45 UTC (540 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Towards Reducing Manual Workload in Technology-Assisted Reviews: Estimating Ranking Performance, by Grace E. Lee and Aixin Sun
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.IR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-01
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Grace E. Lee
Aixin Sun
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack