Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:2111.06348 (math)
[Submitted on 11 Nov 2021]

Title:Enhanced Formulation for Guillotine 2D Cutting Problems

Authors:Henrique Becker, Olinto Araujo, Luciana S. Buriol
View PDF
Abstract:We advance the state of the art in Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) formulations for Guillotine 2D Cutting Problems by (i) adapting a previously known reduction to our preprocessing phase and by (ii) enhancing a previous formulation by cutting down its size and symmetries. Our focus is the Guillotine 2D Knapsack Problem with orthogonal and unrestricted cuts, constrained demand, unlimited stages, and no rotation -- however, the formulation may be adapted to many related problems. The code is available. Concerning the set of 59 instances used to benchmark the original formulation, and summing the statistics for all models generated, the enhanced formulation has only a small fraction of the variables and constraints of the original model (respectively, 3.07% and 8.35%). The enhanced formulation also takes about 4 hours to solve all instances while the original formulation takes 12 hours to solve 53 of them (the other six runs hit a three-hour time limit each). We integrate, to both formulations, a pricing framework proposed for the original formulation; the enhanced formulation keeps a significant advantage in this situation. Finally, in a recently proposed set of 80 harder instances, the enhanced formulation (with and without the pricing framework) found: 22 optimal solutions for the unrestricted problem (5 already known, 17 new); 22 optimal solutions for the restricted problem (all are new and they are not the same 22 of the optimal unrestricted solutions); better lower bounds for 25 instances; better upper bounds for 58 instances.
Comments: 22 pages, 6 tables
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Mathematical Software (cs.MS)
MSC classes: 68R05 (Primary), 68U99, 05D99, 52B99
Cite as: arXiv:2111.06348 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:2111.06348v1 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.06348

Submission history

From: Henrique Becker [view email]
[v1] Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:59:35 UTC (57 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.DM
cs.DS
cs.MS
math

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)