Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:2110.10754

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:2110.10754 (math)
[Submitted on 20 Oct 2021 (v1), last revised 9 Nov 2021 (this version, v2)]

Title:A Theoretical and Computational Analysis of Full Strong-Branching

Authors:Santanu S. Dey, Yatharth Dubey, Marco Molinaro, Prachi Shah
View a PDF of the paper titled A Theoretical and Computational Analysis of Full Strong-Branching, by Santanu S. Dey and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Full strong-branching is a well-known variable selection rule that is known experimentally to produce significantly smaller branch-and-bound trees in comparison to all other known variable selection rules. In this paper, we attempt an analysis of the performance of the strong-branching rule both from a theoretical and a computational perspective. On the positive side for strong-branching we identify vertex cover as a class of instances where this rule provably works well. In particular, for vertex cover we present an upper bound on the size of the branch-and-bound tree using strong-branching as a function of the additive integrality gap, show how the Nemhauser-Trotter property of persistency which can be used as a pre-solve technique for vertex cover is being recursively and consistently used throughout the strong-branching based branch-and-bound tree, and finally provide an example of a vertex cover instance where not using strong-branching leads to a tree that has at least exponentially more nodes than the branch-and-bound tree based on strong-branching. On the negative side for strong-branching, we identify another class of instances where strong-branching based branch-and-bound tree has exponentially larger tree in comparison to another branch-and-bound tree for solving these instances. On the computational side, we conduct experiments on various types of instances to understand how much larger is the size of the strong-branching based branch-and-bound tree in comparison to the optimal branch-and-bound tree. The main take-away from these experiments is that for all these instances, the size of the strong-branching based branch-and-bound tree is within a factor of two of the size of the optimal branch-and-bound tree.
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:2110.10754 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:2110.10754v2 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.10754
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yatharth Dubey [view email]
[v1] Wed, 20 Oct 2021 19:51:24 UTC (1,180 KB)
[v2] Tue, 9 Nov 2021 20:32:23 UTC (828 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Theoretical and Computational Analysis of Full Strong-Branching, by Santanu S. Dey and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-10
Change to browse by:
math

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack