Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:2110.05535v1 (stat)
[Submitted on 11 Oct 2021 (this version), latest version 19 Jun 2023 (v4)]

Title:SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes

Authors:John J. Dziak (1), Daniel Almirall (2), Walter Dempsey (2), Catherine Stanger (3), Inbal Nahum-Shani (2) ((1) Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University (2) Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan (3) Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College)
View PDF
Abstract:Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) play an increasingly important role in psychological and behavioral health research. This experimental approach enables researchers to answer scientific questions about how best to sequence and match interventions to the unique and changing needs of individuals. A variety of sample size calculations have been developed in recent years, enabling researchers to plan SMARTs for addressing different types of scientific questions. However, relatively limited attention has been given to planning SMARTs with binary (dichotomous) outcomes, which often require higher sample sizes relative to continuous outcomes. Existing resources for estimating sample size requirements for SMARTs with binary outcomes do not consider the potential ability to improve power by including a baseline measurement and/or multiple longitudinal measurements. The current paper addresses this issue by providing sample size formulas for longitudinal binary outcomes and exploring their performance via simulations.
Comments: 61 pages, 1 figure, submitted to Psychological Methods
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
MSC classes: 62K15, 62P15
ACM classes: J.4
Cite as: arXiv:2110.05535 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2110.05535v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.05535

Submission history

From: John Dziak [view email]
[v1] Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:19:30 UTC (1,002 KB)
[v2] Thu, 18 Aug 2022 22:44:28 UTC (1,509 KB)
[v3] Wed, 15 Feb 2023 01:10:21 UTC (1,189 KB)
[v4] Mon, 19 Jun 2023 15:28:25 UTC (1,381 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-10
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)